'Gone Girl': The movie doesn't move beyond the formulaic

'Gone Girl' stars Ben Affleck as Nick Dunne, who comes under suspicion for murder when his wife Amy (Rosamund Pike) disappears.

Merrick Morton/20th Century Fox/AP
'Gone Girl' stars Ben Affleck (l.), Lisa Banes (center), and David Clennon (r.).

“Gone Girl,” directed by David Fincher and adapted rather faithfully by Gillian Flynn from her bestselling novel, is a murder mystery that may or may not actually contain a murder (or two).

I’m not a fan of larding reviews with spoiler alerts, so I’ll just say that, in essence, for those who haven’t already read the book, “Gone Girl” is about a wife, Amy (Rosamund Pike), who goes missing, and the husband, Nick Dunne (Ben Affleck), who becomes a murder suspect. Amy and Nick, both struggling writers in New York, had relocated to small-town Missouri, where Nick’s mother is ailing. There they became bored out of their skulls. Their marriage, seemingly based on the fact that both parties are collectively better-looking than anybody else, disintegrates. 

The film alternates between Nick’s and Amy’s perspective, with Amy’s diary entries providing the necessary back story. The flashbacks to their swank New York lifestyle contrast harshly with the bland, grayed-out Missouri scenes. Fincher and Flynn betray a snooty bias here: Heartland equals boring. The only enlivening thing about this territory apparently is the violence that erupts from it. 

I’ve never been a huge fan of Fincher’s Prince of Darkness-like prowess. “Seven” and “The Fight Club” were a smart adolescent’s idea of the heart of darkness, and “The Social Network” was a glib, smart-alecky epic about a master race of supernerds. His best film, I think, was “Zodiac,” which was overlong but mountingly creepy.

In his new film, as in his last, “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo,” his directorial finesse can’t disguise the potboiler source material. (Nor does he seem to care.) The film’s stabs at social commentary – the constant barrage of tabloid TV coverage – are crushingly obvious. Affleck is smoothly proficient but (this is probably Fincher’s failing) skimps the darker shades that might have flipped this film from melodrama to drama.  Pike is riveting without being altogether interesting. She holds the screen with her beautful blankness. A few of the supporting players, including Kim Dickens, as a suspicious local cop, and Carrie Coon, as Nick’s twin sister, move beyond the formulaic, which is more than can be said for the movie. Grade: C+ (Rated R for a scene of bloody violence, some strong sexual content/nudity, and language.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Gone Girl': The movie doesn't move beyond the formulaic
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today