'X-Men: Days of Future Past' is witty and has dynamic action scenes

( PG-13 ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

'X-Men: Days of Future Past' has some confusing time-travel scenarios, but when the movie's this fun, that doesn't matter.

Alan Markfield/20th Century Fox/AP
'X-Men: Days of Future Past' stars Michael Fassbender (r.).

I was pleasantly surprised by “X-Men: Days of Future Past.” Given that these Marvel superhero franchise movies are not going to go away anytime soon – not in this millennium – I suppose we should be grateful for the few that actually deliver the goods.

Time travel is the centerpiece for this new Bryan Singer-directed installment, initially set in the future. A government army of Sentinels, mutant-killing robots, have forced Prof. Charles Xavier (Patrick Stewart), Lehnsherr/Magneto (Ian McKellan), and some others of their ilk into a Chinese safe house. Their only hope is to transport Logan/Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) – or, to be exact, his consciousness – back to 1973 in order to undo the Sentinel program and make the world once again (sort of ) safe for mutants.

The young Charles is played by James McAvoy, Magneto by Michael Fassbender. The plot hinges on liberating Magneto from the subterranean Pentagon prison where he is being held for a particularly heinous crime (not to be revealed here). Raven/Mystique (Jennifer Lawrence), shape-shifty as always, snarls into view, threatening to take down the scientist (Peter Dinklage) whose relationship with mutants is not unlike Ahab’s with Moby Dick. 

What elevates this film above most of its predecessors is the dynamic action filmmaking and, above all, its wit. (The script is by Simon Kinberg.) The ‘70s scenes, with their period references to lava lamps and waterbeds and Tricky Dick Nixon, provide the requisite chortles. The best scene in the movie is actually relatively free from mayhem: Quicksilver (Evan Peters) intercedes in a shoot-out with such celerity that he has time to rearrange the scene to the advantage of Team Mutant while everyone remains frozen in superslow-motion. It’s a classic sequence, worthy of audience applause.

I couldn’t follow many of the ins and outs of the time-travel scenario, and I’m not altogether sure that the filmmakers could, either. It doesn’t really matter. It’s enough that the movie is fun. We shouldn’t also expect it to make sense. Grade: B+ (Rated PG- 13 for sequences of intense sci-fi violence and action, some suggestive material, nudity and language.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.