Skip to footer

Oscars 2014: Who will triumph? Check out our predictions

Who will be bringing home the golden statuettes come Oscar night? Here are our picks.

3. Best Actress

Merrick Morton/Sony Picture Classics/AP
Cate Blanchett (l.) stars in 'Blue Jasmine.'

  • By Molly Driscoll Staff Writer

The Oscar contenders:

–Amy Adams, "American Hustle"

–Cate Blanchett, "Blue Jasmine"

–Sandra Bullock, "Gravity"

–Judi Dench, "Philomena"

–Meryl Streep, "August: Osage County"

The Envelope, Please: This race is as close to a sure thing as the Oscars will see this year. While Sandra Bullock, a winner in this category for the 2009 film "The Blind Side," has received a lot of praise for her portrayal of an astronaut adrift in space, Blanchett took the Golden Globe, the Screen Actors Guild Award, and the British Academy of Film and Television Award as well as practically every other prize for which she's been nominated for this role. "Jasmine" finds the actress portraying a formerly wealthy woman who loses everything when her husband commits fraud and this portrayal will surely earn her the Best Actress prize. Blanchett took home the Best Supporting Actress Oscar in 2005 for her role as Katharine Hepburn in "The Aviator" and was nominated for Best Actress in 1999 and 2008 for playing Elizabeth I in "Elizabeth" and "Elizabeth: The Golden Age," respectively. She was also nominated for Best Supporting Actress in 2007 for the film "Notes on a Scandal" and in 2008 for portraying Bob Dylan in "I'm Not There."

3 of 5
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.