'Winter's Tale' has impressive period detail but overly mushy romance

( PG-13 ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

'Winter' stars Colin Farrell and Jessica Brown Findlay.

David C. Lee/Warner Bros./AP
'Winter's Tale' stars Colin Farrell (l.) and Jessica Brown Findlay (r.).

The ad line for “Winter’s Tale” reads “This is not a true story, it’s a love story.” The movie itself is every bit as gaga as that line. Adapted by writer-director Akiva Goldsman from the sprawling Mark Helprin magical-realist bestseller, it’s about a master thief, Peter Lake (Colin Farrell), who is swept away by Beverly Penn (Jessica Brown Findlay, from “Downton Abbey”), a consumptive, red-haired beauty. Their love, or the ache of its absence, takes place in three different years: 1895, 1916, and 2014. The period detail is impressive; the romanticism is gooey.

Peter’s nemesis is his mentor in crime, the (literally) demonic Pearly Somes, played by Russell Crowe in a gutteral mode that threatened at any moment to turn operatic. (Fortunately, it doesn’t. I’m still recovering from his warbling in “Les Misérables.”) Goldsman, directing his first feature, is trying to achieve a fairy-tale radiance, not an easy achievement even for a seasoned pro. Most of the time the magic on view is distinctly unmagical – too many twinkling stars.

He’s pretty good with actors, though, and he’s stocked his cast with additional worthies, including Eva Marie Saint, William Hurt, Jennifer Connelly, and, in an unbilled cameo, Will Smith as no less than Lucifer. If only there was less mush and more meat in this stew. Grade: C+ (Rated PG-13 for violence and some sensuality.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.