'Carrie' focuses on the girl-power aspect of Stephen King's story

'Carrie' stars Chloë Grace Moretz as a teenager who is tricked by her peers with deadly results.

Michael Gibson/Sony Pictures/AP
'Carrie' stars Chloë Grace Moretz (r.) and Julianne Moore (l.).

Brian DePalma’s 1976 film “Carrie,” based on Stephen King’s 1974 novel, is such an iconic horror classic that I was hoping the new Kimberly Peirce remake would represent an entirely new rethinking – or else why bother?

DePalma’s movie was a frightful piece of japery about a teenager, played by Sissy Spacek, whose first menstruation, about which her schoolmates relentlessly hound her, is linked to her discovery that she is telekinetic. Raised by a Christian fundamentalist single mother, played by Piper Laurie, Carrie’s initiation into womanhood and sexuality turns into a literal bloodbath on prom night.

Peirce doesn’t have DePalma’s dirty-minded adolescent temperament or his voluptuous sense of dread. Her film, starring Chloë Grace Moretz as Carrie and Julianne Moore as her mother, is more straightforward in its shocks. Although bullying in schools is a more pronounced issue now than it was back in the '70s, DePalma’s film certainly didn’t play down its “Mean Girls” aspect.

By focusing on Carrie’s rabid desire for vengeance in the wake of the prom, Peirce has made a girl-power version of the King material. But the finale is truncated and the final image is a tired frisson promising a sequel. Peirce is gifted, but she lacks the ability of directors like DePalma to transform schlock into something deeply personal. Grade B- (Rated R for bloody violence, disturbing images, language and some sexual content.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Carrie' focuses on the girl-power aspect of Stephen King's story
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today