'Don Jon' starts off promisingly but becomes too sappy

'Don Jon' director Joseph Gordon-Levitt keeps up a racy, jaunty tone for the first portion of the movie, but the plot gradually becomes less interesting.

Daniel McFadden/Relativity Media/AP
'Don Jon' stars Joseph Gordon-Levitt (l.) and Scarlett Johansson (r.).

Joseph Gordon-Levitt stars in and makes his feature directing debut in “Don Jon,” a movie about a Don Juan with a porn addiction. It’s a promising subject – a comedy about a lothario for the self-obsessed Internet era – and for a while, both as actor and director, Gordon-Levitt provides a racy, jaunty tone. For all his wolfishness, his Jon Martello Jr. is basically an affable lug. He meets his match with Scarlett Johansson’s Barbara Sugarman, a Jersey girl who wouldn’t have been out of place on “Jersey Shore.”

It doesn’t take long for her to get his number, at which point the movie becomes increasingly soft-edged and sappy. True love beckons in the guise of a dingbat played by Julianne Moore and all is right with the world. As Jon’s father, a man whose lifeblood is yelling, Tony Danza is very funny. He makes you understand what his son is escaping from. Grade: C+ (Rated R for strong graphic sexual material and dialogue throughout, nudity, language and some drug use.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Don Jon' starts off promisingly but becomes too sappy
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today