'The Act of Killing' has a repellant film conceit

( Unrated ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

'Killing' has members of Indonesian death squads, responsible for the deaths of millions, act out their murders, and the result is that the criminals get to boast about their deeds.

Drafthouse Films
A musical reenactment scene from Drafthouse Films' documentary, The Act of Killing.'

In the documentary “The Act of Killing,” gangsters from the Indonesian death squads, who began their massacres in 1965 and claimed more than 2 million lives over the next year, are encouraged to act out their murders in the guise of a movie staged by the film’s director, Joshua Oppenheimer.

Far from remorseful, these men, celebrated to this day as heroes, crow about their tortures, demonstrating for us their preferred ways of killing in mock-ups drawing on everything from “Scarface” to Carmen Miranda musicals. The effect is intended to be ghastly – which it certainly is – but I was equally repelled by this film’s conceit. Oppenheimer allows murderous thugs free rein to preen their atrocities, and then fobs it all off as some kind of exalted art thing. This is more than an aesthetic crime; it’s a moral crime. Grade: D (Unrated.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.