'The Hangover Part III' shows the series has worn out its welcome

'The Hangover Part III' is a collection of gross-outs that are missing the laughs.

Warner Bros. Pictures/AP
'The Hangover Part III' stars Justin Bartha (l.), Zach Galifianakis (second from l.), Ed Helms (second from r.), and Bradley Cooper (r.).

The first “Hangover” movie was a monster hit that I found mildly amusing. The sequel was a scummy, unfunny mess. Now we have “The Hangover Part III,” which is being billed as the last in the series. Let’s hope so.

The wolf pack is on the prowl again, ending up in Vegas where it all began, sort of. Bradley Cooper and Ed Helms are essentially straight men to Zach Galifianakis’s Alan and Ken Jeong’s Mr. Chow, both of whom take turns trying to gross everybody out. But gross-outs devoid of laughs?

The tonal problem of the second installment, which often resembled a drug-infested pulp thriller instead of a comedy, is also problematic here. Grade: C- (Rated R for pervasive language including sexual references, some violence and drug content, and brief graphic nudity.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.