'Stoker' employs cinematic tricks that don't impress

'Stoker' centers on precocious India Stoker (Mia Wasikowska), who is unnaturally fixated on her mysterious uncle.

Macall Polay/Fox Searchlight Pictures/AP
'Stoker' stars Mia Wasikowska (l.) and Matthew Goode (r.).

No, “Stoker” isn’t about vampires, although, from a commercial standpoint, it might be better if it were. Directed by South Korean auteur Park Chan-wook in his English-language debut, it’s an overweeningly stylish horror fantasia about India Stoker (Mia Wasikowska), a precocious high schooler with an unnatural fixation on her unnatural uncle Charlie (Matthew Goode). Her father recently died mysteriously and her mother, Evelyn (Nicole Kidman), has allowed Charlie to reside indefinitely in their expansive homestead. Evelyn appears to be just about as ga-ga as Charlie – neither of them blink a lot – but India turns out to be just about as wacko. She doesn’t blink much, either.

Park employs all manner of cinematic derring-do – shock cuts, off-kilter compositions, discontinuous storytelling – all to no great purpose other than to make us go “Wow.” A more appropriate response might be, “Huh?” Grade: C (Rated R for disturbing violent and sexual content.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.