Kristen Stewart stars in 'On the Road'

'On the Road' isn't worth the wait caused by the project's long development period.

IFC Films/Sundance Selects/AP
Sam Riley (l.) and Garrett Hedlund (r.) star in 'On the Road.'

Jack Kerouac’s iconic novel “On the Road” has been in Hollywood’s cross hairs ever since it was published back in 1957. Kerouac himself wanted Marlon Brando to make a movie of it, and for many years, Francis Ford Coppola was involved. He’s still listed as an executive producer for the Walter Salles film of “On the Road,” starring Sam Riley as Sal (modeled on Kerouac), Garrett Hedlund as Dean Moriarty (based on Neal Cassady) and Kristen Stewart as Dean’s mercurial wife Marylou (based on LuAnne Henderson).

Was it worth the wait? Not really, and not just because the wait has outlasted the story’s immediacy. Kerouac’s novel about wayfaring bohemians hitting the open road is a classic expression of the American dream; but the way it’s done here, it seems more like a time capsule that’s been dug up long past its expiration date. Salles tries to approximate Kerouac’s hopped-up prose by shooting the film in jittery jump-cuts, and the actors seem to be careening between scenes rather than inhabiting them. It’s all rather exhausting, as opposed to exhilirating. Grade: C (Rated R for strong sexual content, drug use and language.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Kristen Stewart stars in 'On the Road'
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today