The Dark Knight Rises: movie review

( PG-13 ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

The movie's ambitions aren't matched by its material.

Ron Phillips/Warner Bros. Pictures/AP
'The Dark Knight Rises' actor Tom Hardy portrays Bane, Batman's new nemesis.

The Dark Knight Rises” doesn’t really rise to the occasion. This concluding movie in the "Batman" trilogy isn’t just dark, it’s pitch black. Director Christopher Nolan has literally gone over to the dark side.

Of course, “The Dark Knight,” which I admired, was similarly hued; but that film had a grandeur, a tragic sense, that “Rises” lacks. It also had Heath Ledger’s Joker, whereas “Rises” has as Batman’s chief nemesis a brawny mercenary named Bane, played by Tom Hardy in a face mask with a breathing device conveniently attached. Please note: That’s spelled B-a-n-e, not B-a-i-n.

One of the reasons why nemeses are so important in the "Batman" series is because Batman himself, at least as played by Christian Bale, is not terribly galvanizing. In “Rises,” which begins eight years after “The Dark Knight,” Batman is no longer around and Bruce Wayne is in seclusion. Gotham City is relatively crime-free, although all that is about to change when Bane hulks onto the scene.

What follows is an extended sadomasochistic scenario in which Batman is clobbered within an inch of his life before coming around. I’ve always been partial to Batman as a superhero because, in fact, he has no superpowers. He’s an enhanced Everyman. But watching what happens to him in “Rises” made me wish he had something extra-human going on.

There’s a punitive, depressive edge to this film that isn’t fully warranted by its story – which, for all its pretensions, is a fairly conventional extension of the franchise. Were it not for Anne Hathaway’s Catwoman-ish Selina Kyle, there wouldn’t be a single character in “Rises” who cracks a smile.
 I’m not arguing that “Rises” should be “Singin’ in the Rain.” But its Wagnerian ambitions are not matched by its material. It hasn’t earned its darkness. Grade: C+ (Rated PG-13 for intense sequences of violence and action, some sensuality and language.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.