'The Five Year Engagement,' starring Emily Blunt, Jason Segel: movie review (+trailer)

'The Five Year Engagement,' starring Emily Blunt and Jason Segel, gives career planning a charming, comedic twist.

Glen Wilson/Universal Pictures/AP
'The Five-Year Engagement' is an overextended but sweet comedy that doesn't play the characters' career dilemmas for easy laughs.

Given the fact that “The Five Year Engagement” is from the creative team – director and co-writer Nicholas Stoller, costar and co-writer Jason Segel, and producer Judd Apatow – that brought us “Forgetting Sarah Marshall,” I was expecting something raunchier. Instead, what we have here is a wistful, somewhat overextended but occasionally sweet comedy about a couple that can’t – in more ways than one – quite get it together.

Tom (Segel), a sous-chef at an upscale San Francisco restaurant, and Violet (Emily Blunt), a psychology grad student, meet cute at a New Year’s Eve party –she’s dressed as Lady Di, he as a pink bunny – and rapidly become a twosome headed for the altar. But when she is offered an attractive two-year postdoc fellowship in Michigan, they decide to make the move and hold off on the wedding. Tom essentially gives up his career for her, although the film makes it seem as if the only good jobs for a top chef in Michigan are making deli sandwiches. (The swipes at Michigan in this film don’t stop there – their Chamber of Commerce should sue.)

Tom, who spends his newfound time smoking venison and growing mutton chops, comes across as so “understanding” that he’s almost stunted, so it’s something of a relief to us, if not to Violet, when he finally explodes. What keeps the film from seeming shrill is that Tom and Violet, despite everything, genuinely love each other, and their careers dilemma is not played for easy laughs. Grade: B (Rated R for sexual content, and language throughout.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.