Bullhead: movie review

The Belgian movie ‘Bullhead’ takes a quirky premise and turns it into a high-stakes thriller.

Drafthouse Films
Matthias Schoenaerts as cattle farmer Jacky Vanmarsenille in ‘Bullhead.’

"Bullhead," which lost out this year to "A Separation" in the foreign film Oscar category, is a curious amalgam of pulp theatrics and psychological drama. Fortunately, the drama wins out much of the time.

The story takes off from a 1990s murder of a Belgian veterinarian who, despite repeated intimidation from criminal gangs, continued to investigate the use of illegal growth hormone on cattle.

The so-called hormone mafia may seem like an unlikely, even risible, subject for a movie, but first-time writer-director Michael Roskam makes it very clear that the stakes are as high here as in any other form of big-ticket crime. Still, I was not overly interested in yet another crime movie, from Belgium or anywhere else, that simply retreads the same pulp paces.

"Bullhead" periodically falls into that rut, but what saves it is the performance of its lead actor, Matthias Schoenaerts, who is a kind of human bull. At least he seems so at first. His Jacky works on the family cattle farm and is dead set against an illegal deal with a local meat tycoon (Sam Louwyck) for the very good reason that the tycoon is being investigated by the police for murder.

Jacky is bulked up by the testosterone shots he regularly injects, and when the reasons for this emerge, he takes on the contours of a tragic figure right out of a classic film noir. Schoenaerts has the gift of being able to make inarticulateness expressive. Perhaps this is why, in moments, he seems to recall Brando and Dean. He's not in their stratosphere, and "Bullhead" certainly isn't, but for American audiences the film signals the arrival of a powerful star actor. Grade: B (Rated R for some strong violence, language, and sexual content.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.