Return: movie review

( Unrated ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

Linda Cardellini's nuanced take on a mother searching for her place is finely observed.

|
Fork Films
Linda Cardellini plays a soldier struggling to fit in after coming home in ‘Return,’ writer/ director Liza Johnson’s debut feature.

Kelli (Linda Cardellini) returns to her small Rust Belt hometown after a tour of duty in one of the United States' recent wars. She's glad to be back with husband Mike (Michael Shannon) and two daughters, but, as her attempts to adjust fail, even those relationships begin to fray. Her old friends want to hear war stories, but Kelli isn't really interested in the subject; her memories are more of tedium than action or heroism.

Everyone is walking on eggshells, and with good reason. Despite her initial sense that she can just go back to how things were, she finds her friends' everyday chatter unengaging, then trivial and even irritating. The warehouse job she's held for a decade now strikes her as meaningless; she simply walks away from it. And she also is put off by everyone asking her if she cheated on Mike while overseas.

All foreign wars have their own tales about the tribulations of returning servicemen. Stories about re-turnees trying to reintegrate into what was once their normal world probably predate Homer. In the last century, World War I gave us Hemingway's "Soldier's Home," and World War II "The Best Years of Our Lives," to name two masterpieces. Such stories are all the same, and they are all different.

The increased role of women in the military over the past few decades has added gender issues into the mix. (Rachel McAdams played a similar, but arguably shallower, role in 2008's "The Lucky Ones.") "Return," writer/director Liza Johnson's debut feature, fits the "Soldier's Home" template; most of the issues are similar, but being a woman surely shades some of them. When Kelli makes a minor irresponsible blunder with one of the kids, Mike furiously upbraids her. The onus would likely be less (or at least different) if the roles were reversed.

There are also economic and class issues in play. She and Mike are constantly scrambling to make ends meet; she can't just take advantage of the GI Bill when her family needs that warehouse salary now. There seems to be no place – professionally or personally – where she'll fit in. Johnson simply shows us Kelli's life; the only development that approaches being a resolution is ironic and temporary.

Shannon chalks up another line on his rapidly growing résumé of memorable performances. But it's mostly Cardellini's show – she's in every scene. Her portrayal may at first seem opaque, as though she isn't quite sure who Kelli is. But that is, of course, the point. Kelli isn't quite sure who Kelli is. Grade: B (Unrated)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Return: movie review
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Movies/2012/0210/Return-movie-review
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe