Democrats prize ‘equity,’ GOP prefers ‘equality'

As Democrats promote 'equity,' Republicans decry it as a mutation of 'equality.' But can both words – and parties – have the common good in mind?


When President Joe Biden took office in January, his first executive order announced a “whole-of-government equity agenda.” Historically, similar sentiments have been expressed with a different, but related word: equality. “All men are created equal,” asserts the Declaration of Independence. Why does equity seem to be replacing equality as a political and social goal? 

Both words have the same Latin ancestor, aequus, which can mean “level, equal” or “fair, impartial” or “calm.” The English word equality took aequus’ first definition, making its domain “equalness,” things that are the same. Equity got the second sense – it is about “fairness.” (The third sense appears in equanimity, “evenness of mind.”)

There are several widely shared graphics online that explain this distinction. One depicts two people on either side of an apple tree, trying to pick the fruit though neither can reach the branches. Equality is represented by giving each person an identical ladder. The branches hang lower on one side, however, so the ladder enables person A to reach them, but the apples are still out of reach for person B. Equity involves giving person B a longer ladder, so that both have the same opportunity.

In the cartoon, this seems like simple common sense; in the real world, equity is a political minefield. While an equal distribution of goods is cut and dried – everybody gets the same – an equitable one involves making decisions about who needs more, for what. Equity is thus tied up with issues of identity and discrimination. Longer ladders must go to Black people and Native Americans, for example, because they have experienced systemic racism. But what about other people – women, recent immigrants, wheelchair users – who have faced their own obstacles? Even when Democratic politicians agree on which groups most need help, they often disagree about how to go about it.  

To conservatives, equity has become a dirty word. Its mutability, plus its association with “identity politics” and “government handouts,” has led newspapers such as The Wall Street Journal to decry it as a poor substitute for equality.  

But equity seems less a substitute for equality than an evolution. The founders’ declaration encouraged America to see itself as a “land of equal opportunity.” The idea of equity, too, posits a level playing field and equality of opportunity – it just pays more attention to the ways in which, and the people for whom, this ideal falls short. Democrats and Republicans may disagree about what an equitable society should look like, and how to get there, but equality is still a principle they each hold dear.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Democrats prize ‘equity,’ GOP prefers ‘equality'
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today