Venturing into the land of social media acronyms

“Tl;dr” is the only internet abbreviation I know of that boasts a perfectly used semicolon. Where did the acronym originate?

Staff

A few weeks ago, I discovered that there are clues to each day’s New York Times crossword puzzle in the newspaper’s Wordplay column. Reading this column has not only helped me solve lots more puzzles, but also introduced me to some unfamiliar social media acronyms and slang.

In her April 5, 2020, Wordplay column, Deb Amlen hides the puzzle’s theme behind a link: “Tl;dr (Spoiler!).” I had to find out more about this one. It is the only internet abbreviation I know of that boasts a perfectly used semicolon, although it seems that few people use the semicolon any longer. Tl;dr stands for “too long; didn’t read” and it seems to have begun in the early 2000s. It is hard to read large chunks of text online, so someone who posts, say, a 10-paragraph essay on her theories about “Star Trek” might receive a disgruntled tl;dr (or tldr) in response. Or she might realize she had gone on too long and acknowledge the fact by typing tldr at the end.  

Tldr can also be understood as the main point of a long piece – what you might call a summary. The acronym flags the takeaway, so that someone pressed for time can easily decide if the whole thing seems worth reading. This abbreviation is common enough to be defined in Merriam-Webster, but is still probably not appropriate for all contexts. Tech writer Andrew Heinzman gives a helpful rule: “Don’t throw around tldr anywhere you wouldn’t say lol.” 

Working on a puzzle from the archives (Dec. 8, 2017), I came across this clue: “Social media post that refers to another user without directly mentioning that person.” The answer turned out to be “subtweet.” To understand this one, I had to get more familiar with Twitter, which I usually avoid because my preferred speed of non-face-to-face communication is still U.S. mail.

Bear with me if you already know all this. If you tweet and include a person’s handle (@username), he or she will be notified of your post. If you don’t, the person won’t get a notification, although he or she might still run across the tweet. 

Subtweets are the social media version of talking behind someone’s back. The word has now found currency outside the digital realm, though, and can be applied to any piece of oblique criticism. A recent example: A classmate of my daughter’s, let’s call her Jane, wore her pajamas during their online physics class. The next day, the dean called a Zoom meeting and declared that it was unacceptable to wear pajamas during school, even while quarantined. The dean’s message was a subtweet, according to my daughter, because it publicly rebuked Jane without actually mentioning her by name. 

More TILs (today I learned) to come in the next column.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.