The most searched-for words of 2019

The top words of the year in 2019 reflected shifting attitudes toward gender identity, along with an increase in anxiety about climate change.

Staff

Dictionaries announced their words of the year (WOTY) for 2019, and I am here for it, as my Gen Z daughter would say. I love reading about the most frequently looked-up words, and the ones chosen by lexicographers “to reflect the ethos, mood, or preoccupations of the passing year,” as Oxford Dictionaries puts it. This year, dictionaries were starkly divided in their interpretation of 2019.

The mood at Oxford Dictionaries seems to have been full-on apocalyptic. Its 2019 WOTY is climate emergency, a “rebranding” that makes sense. Climate change seems slow and natural, like the seasons, and global warming might sound nice, but a climate emergency is a disaster that requires immediate attention. Oxford’s shortlist is equally alarming, featuring climate crisis, extinction, and two words I’d never heard before: eco-anxiety and ecocide. Eco-anxiety is self-explanatory, while ecocide means “destruction of the natural environment by deliberate or negligent human action.” Interest in the latter spiked last year due to a campaign to make it a crime, like genocide, under international law.

Cambridge Dictionary also focused on the environment, but took a more positive view. Its WOTY is upcycling, “the activity of making new furniture, objects, etc. out of old or used things or waste material.” Compostable, preservation, and carbon sink, an area of forest that traps carbon dioxide, also made it onto its shortlist. Upcycling won, the editors explain, because it is a small, “concrete action a single human being can take to make a difference.”

Merriam-Webster’s list includes some of the most common English words and some of the rarest. Its editors picked they as the WOTY, but not as it is typically used, as the third-person plural pronoun. They chose to highlight its growing use as a singular, gender-neutral pronoun. This is welcome news for those who do not identify as either male or female.

The No. 1 most common English word – the – appears on Merriam-Webster’s shortlist because searches for it spiked 500% after The Ohio State University tried and failed to trademark the word. Tergiversation was also shortlisted, as searches for it skyrocketed when columnist George Will referred to Lindsey Graham’s “tergiversations” in The Washington Post. According to Merriam-Webster, the word has two related meanings: “evasion of straightforward action or clear-cut statement” and “desertion of a cause, position, party, or faith.”

What all the 2019 WOTY winners have in common is that they are responding to the concerns of Gen Z and others who believe we are indeed experiencing a climate emergency, and that individuals should be free to identify themselves how they wish.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.