Status words reflect changing times

Terms that at first simply denote status come to acquire moral connotations – low-status words gain negative meanings and high-status words pick up positive ones.

KitchenA­id/PRNewsFoto
A new range of stainless steel KitchenAid appliances is showcased in what some millennials might describe as a "bougie" kitchen.

I was chatting with a millennial, and he said his cousin lived in a bougie apartment. I knew that “bougie” was slang for “bourgeois,” but I didn’t know what he meant. Was he implying that the apartment was vulgar, evidence of the cousin’s embarrassing desire to move up in the world? Or did he just mean it was nice?  

Bougie, or boujee, as it is sometimes spelled, is the latest in a long line of words affected by a process that C.S. Lewis called “the moralization of status words.” Terms that at first simply denote status come to acquire moral connotations – low-status words gain negative meanings and high-status words pick up positive ones.   

Noble and gentle, for example, originally indicated that a person was well-born without implying anything about his or her character. Since the 13th century, however, noble has described a person of high moral principles, while gentle applies to a mild and kind temperament.

We find more examples of words going in the other direction. At first, churl (or ceorl) designated the lowest-ranking free (not serf or slave) people in Anglo-Saxon society. Nowadays a churlish person is “intentionally rude ... surly, ungracious,” according to the Oxford English Dictionary. Villain fell even further; it began as a term for a feudal serf but morphed into one for an evil-doer, a “depraved scoundrel.” In Old English, a knave was a boy or a peasant; now the word refers to “a dishonest unprincipled man.” The list goes on – rogue once meant “vagabond” instead of “rascal,” harlot was a word for “servant” before it meant “rogue” (in the 13th century) and finally “unchaste woman.” Vulgar itself comes from the Latin for “common people,” but now refers to something or someone who is “coarse” or “unrefined and ill-bred.”  

Where does that leave bougie? The bourgeoisie, which is defined by its in-between position, was a class that historically faced scorn by the upper classes (who condemned it as vulgar and striving) and the lower classes (who criticized it as conventional and overly materialistic). If you say “Cherry cabinets and granite countertops are so bourgeois” you might mean either that they are in bad taste, or a sign of their owner’s degenerate materialism.

Bougie is being rehabilitated. Sometimes it has the negative connotations of bourgeois, but it can also imply a delight in having enough money to indulge in middle- or upper-class things. Bougie means acknowledging that there might be something pretentious about your truffled lobster mac ’n’ cheese, but enjoying it anyway. Bougie turns the moralization of status words on its head.

A “bougie” apartment is probably a very nice one, then, with stainless steel appliances, big windows, and a breakfast nook perfect for avocado toast.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.