Counting higher than fingers and toes

Linguists speculate that the base-10 number system developed independently around the world because it was inspired by the most obvious tools we have to count with – our fingers.

Phil Sears/AP
Florida State forward Phil Cofer holds up six fingers – the team's number of wins in a row – after an NCAA college basketball game against Wake Forest in Tallahassee, Fla., Feb. 13, 2019.

From English to Mandarin to Spanish, most languages with hundreds of millions of speakers use a base-10 number system, as we discussed in the column last week. Linguists speculate that this system developed independently around the world because it was inspired by the most obvious tools we have to count with – our fingers. If we look beyond the big, global languages, however, we’ll see that people have come up with different ways of numbering the world.

In some cultures, people have counted their fingers and toes, producing base-20 systems. French, as we saw last week, has the remnants of one of these between the numbers 70 and 99, making 82, for example, quatre-vingt-deux (four 20s + 2). 

It doesn’t seem natural to tally with digits in all cultures, though. Speakers of Yuki, a Native American language of northern California, counted the spaces between the fingers, making a base-8 system. The Northern Pame language, in Mexico, also has a base-8 system, because it counts the knuckles on closed fists. Kewa, in Papua New Guinea, counts the fingers, but not the thumb, of one hand, making a base-4 system. (The word for eight is kilapo, or “two hands”; 12 is ki repo, or “three hands.”)

Base-4 is fine for smaller numbers, but when the Kewa want to count higher, they use what might be considered a base-24 system, taking into account all kinds of body parts. The tallying begins with the fingers of the left hand and moves up the arm, to the radius (10), the ulna (11), and the winya ropa (13), the place where women wear armbands. When riga (24), between the eyes, is reached, the counting moves down the right side of the body to the fingers of the right hand. The Kewa don’t tend to count much past one cycle, being content to say that higher numbers are simply papu, or “very many.” Another Austronesian culture, the Kobon, do keep counting with their body-tally system, giving them numbers such as “hand turn around second time go back biceps other side,” or 61.

You may be feeling superior about good old base-10 at this point. It certainly seems easier to say “sixty-one” than to try to remember how many times you’ve gone past your right-side bicep, let alone adding that to “inside elbow other side.” But is base-10 really the best way to go? 

Some mathematicians argue that we would be even better off with a duodecimal, or base-12 system. Twelve can be divided by 2, 3, 4, and 6, producing “clean” fractions instead of .25 or the ever-repeating .3333333. Members of the Dozenal Society have been advocating such a switch for decades. If they had their way, we would all be counting like speakers of Iguta and Gure in Nigeria, or Chepang in the Himalayas.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.