When is a teacher more than a teacher? More often than not.

As kids transfer from summer vacation to the classroom, one father and school administrator reminds parents to be mindful when considering the many roles a teacher will fill during the school year.

Sarah A. Miller/Tyler Morning Telegraph/AP
First year kindergarten teacher Amy Hiler puts a name tag on student Audrey Gray, 5, Monday morning Aug. 25, 2014 at Birdwell Elementary School in Tyler, Texas. It was the first day of school for Tyler ISD students.

An experienced and wise school head once exclaimed to his teachers during a faculty meeting: “I wish we could put a sign out front of the building saying "Only a School.”

Intended as humor, his lament nonetheless contained an ironic truth. Any group of teachers can sympathize with this exasperation at the web of pressures they feel to play roles other than educator. Add to this our society’s condescension towards the teaching profession. Even great teachers catch themselves thinking, “I’m only a teacher.”

A teacher’s work needs constant defending. Whether in their third or thirty-third year of teaching, they have experienced the pressure to play several or all of the following roles simultaneously: curriculum expert, scholar, psychologist, disciplinarian, traffic cop, marriage counselor, lawyer, minister or priest, mother, father, coach, offensive and defensive coordinator, referee, judge and jury, babysitter, chaperone, sage, and bottle washer. Multi-tasking was invented by teachers.

Sometimes we don’t even realize the roles we ask of teachers; often the request is inappropriate, manipulative, or disguised. Only rarely is it honorific. Do most parents know how often teachers lament, “I wish I could just teach?” They yearn for the clarity and singular purpose implied in working at "only a school." But one should never settle for being only a teacher. Too much is at stake.

We all know that, at the present time, our society, is not going to allow us that simplicity. As David Denby once pointed out in his piece "Buried Alive" in The New Yorker in 1996, the culture is too busy assuring that its children “are shaped by the media as consumers before they’ve had a chance to develop their souls.” And Juliet Schor notes in her article "Dematerializing our Kids" in Hope magazine in 2004, “We have pretty much offered up our kids as a market to be exploited, with virtually no discussion, much less opposition.” 

Our children should not go to the highest bidder! Helping them to develop them takes time, contact, thought, labor, struggle, guidance – and teachers. They’re the remedy for what ails us as a society. And amidst the clamor for accountability and standards, we may be missing the simple, clear eloquence and mentoring of the teacher-student relationship.

Teachers accept an implied call to step in and show wisdom, candor, honesty, and durability, when they are wont to be found elsewhere. Teachers staunch the consumerization and marketing of children.

If simplicity in this issue is denied, clarity is all the more necessary. Another school head I knew liked to remind his faculty of their genius and purpose.

“The best schools are places where hearts and minds come together,” he told us one August. “Certainly that is the case in this school, for you make it so. It is your responsibility to inspire your students – and you will, you always do, for you are inspired. You are inspired by that foolish, brave old dream of a better world, even as you are haunted by that dark fear of a worse one. So there are moral imperatives in your motives. But you are also lifted up by love and laughter, so that you want to do what you have to do. And it is in you to do it, for you are teachers, and that is the nature of teachers. You are, perhaps, the last idealists, and you still believe in your dreams.”

I was inspired, sitting in the faculty audience that day, and now I’m inspired as a parent to think that someone could give such stirring voice to the responsibility and opportunity that teachers take with my children. Now that I am a school head-teacher-parent, I feel charged to insure that this dream of a better world imbues my school’s life. Parents should know that the importance of good teachers has never been greater.

Consider this: despite centuries of educational innovation, curricular fads, and new-fangled "isms" this inspired role of "teacher" has remained substantially unaltered. Teaching is still men and women brave enough to guide nascent intellectuals, artists, athletes, mechanics, computer geeks, and musicians. So school is still, at its heart, a dance of men and women of character.  A school is its teachers. Perhaps there is an ironic, positive strength in saying that “A school is only its teachers.” And we parents should help to “lift them up on love and laughter.”

Todd R. Nelson is principal of the Brooksville Elementary School in Brooksville, Maine. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.