Moms struggle with the expense of diapers, study says

Low-income moms have trouble affording diapers for their children and, as a result, are more likely to become depressed or have anxiety, a study says. 

AP Photo/Rick Bowmer
Moms struggle to purchase diapers for their children and can suffer from depression and anxiety because of it. Huggies diapers and a box of Kirkland diapers are on display at Costco Wednesday, Dec. 7, 2011, in, Portland, Ore.

That classic diaper robbery scene from the Coen Brothers comedy “Raising Arizona” is getting less funny by the minute.

Yale School of Medicine study in the August edition of the journal Pediatrics finds that 30 percent of women cannot afford enough diapers for their children. It further finds that those women are more in danger of depression and anxiety.

If you've ever raised an infant, you know that the hassle of diapers is no laughing matter – travel plans necessarily include and to some degree revolve around some provision for hauling, shipping, or buying piles of diapers on site, and the speed with which used diapers can fill a trash bag is disconcerting to say the least. And if you're struggling to make ends meet, the sheer expense is non-trivial: buying enough disposable diapers for an infant can take 6 percent of a single mother's annual minimum wage income of $15,080, the survey finds. Cloth diapers are no silver bullet – the time and expense involved in laundering cloth diapers is as bad or worse than their eco-hostile, disposable brethren. 

This insight into the cost of diapers – seemingly minor, but actually an important window into one of the many facets of poverty – couldn't come at a more relevant time, as a recent Associated Press survey reveals that a full four–fifths of Americans wrestle with near-poverty, joblessness, and/or reliance on welfare at some point in their lives, a trend exacerbated by a collapse of domestic manufacturing jobs and a widening gap between the rich and the poor.

There's no easy answer to poverty and joblessness across the board, of course. But there may be a simple way to deal with the expense of diapers for people in need. The challenge? Finding bipartisan support for patching this little piece of the frayed safety net. A Los Angeles Times story on the topic found that in 2011, Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D) of Connecticut introduced a bill that would have made it easier to use federal funds to provide diapers to infants in need. It failed – in part because of mockery by critics like radio commentator Rush Limbaugh, who viewed the bill as part of a farsighted plan to indoctrinate children into the cult of liberalism.

Once upon a time, America prided itself on taking care of its less fortunate. And while there is always a valid debate to be had as to the nature and scope of the safety net, it seems like diapers for infants – and the support that would be provided to new mothers by ensuring those diapers are available – is a clear cut win-win for society as a whole and the moms who receive the support.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.