The Harbaugh way: 4 tips for parenting past sibling rivalry

What better way to get the growing family started on a right direction than taking some lessons from HarBowl 2013? In case you feel the same, I thought I’d share our Top Four Ways to Tackle Sibling Rivalry, courtesy of the Harbaughs.

4. Don’t let “sibling rivalry” define the relationship.

Associated Press
Jim Harbaugh and brother John, despite the media headlines, don't want to talk about the rivalry at all. They don't let it define their relationship.

It can be easy for parents to start labeling their kids. You know, Big Sister is the smart one, Little Sister is the artistic one; Little Brother is disorganized and Big Brother gets good grades.

Try to avoid this, parenting experts say – you only set up a sense of competition.  As Dr. Bill Sears writes on his website: “Children are constantly being compared. Most of their life they will be rated on their performance: grades in school, the batting order on the baseball team, races and games among themselves. The home is the only organization left that values a child for himself and not in comparison with others. So, avoid comments like, 'Why can't you make good grades like your brother?”

The Harbaugh brothers have taken this to heart. They don’t really want to talk about the alleged rivalry coming up next week.

“Every moment that you're talking about myself or John, that's less time that the players are going to be talked about," Jim Harbaugh told reporters, saying that it was a “blessing” that his brother’s team made it to the Super Bowl, but a “curse” if all the talk about the HarBowl took away from the actual sport.

And as John Harbaugh told reporters this week:

"I guess it's pretty neat. But is it really going to be written about? It's not exactly like Churchill and Roosevelt or anything. It's pretty cool, but that's as far as it goes.”

4 of 4

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.