Texas day care trial: Jessica Tata lied about previous arson charge

Texas day care trial: A Texas woman convicted of murder for a fire that killed four children at her home day care lied in her application to run the business. The Texas day care trial is in the punishment phase.

(AP Photo/Houston Chronicle, Johnny Hanson)
Home day care operator Jessica Tata at the Harris County Criminal Justice Center Tuesday, Nov. 13, 2012, in Houston, Texas. Tata was convicted of murder when one of four children at her home day care after she left them alone with hot oil on the stove while she shopped at Target.

A Texas woman convicted of murder for a fire that killed four children at her home day care lied in her application to run the business about having a juvenile record, which would have prevented her from getting a child care license, a former state official testified Wednesday.

Jurors heard the testimony during the punishment phase of Jessica Tata's trial. She was found guilty Tuesday of one count of felony murder in one child's death and faces up to life in prison.

Prosecutors said the February 2011 fire started after Tata left the children alone to go shopping, and had left a pan of oil on a stove that was turned on. Her attorneys argued that she never intended to hurt the children, who ranged in age from 16 months to 3 years, and that she tried to save them.

RECOMMENDED: Are you a helicopter parent? Take the quiz

When Tata applied to run her home day care, she didn't indicate she pleaded to an arson charge as a juvenile in connection to two fires on the same day in bathrooms at her suburban Houston high school, said Susan Lahmeyer, a former district director of licensing at the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. The department oversees day care facilities.

"If we had had that information ... that would have prevented the agency from issuing a license," Lahmeyer told jurors. "A history like that elevates the concern about taking care of children."

Lahmeyer said her agency does a background check on all applicants but such a check did not turn up Tata's criminal history. She said she didn't know why Tata's criminal past did not come up.

Tata's attorney, Mike DeGeurin, while questioning Lahmeyer, suggested that Tata had been under the impression that her juvenile criminal history was confidential and she might have misunderstood the question on the application about whether she had pleaded guilty to a crime.

Under the juvenile system, a defendant does not enter a guilty plea but enters a plea of true to a charge. Tata entered a plea of true to delinquent conduct of arson and received probation.

Lisa Hayes, a Houston fire department arson investigator who in 2003 taught a fire prevention class that Tata had to take after her arson case, told jurors Tata didn't seem concerned that individuals could have been injured by the fires she started.

Tata "said she didn't care about hurting other people," Hayes said.

Jurors were also shown photographs of the burns suffered by two of three children who were injured but survived the fire. The photos were of 22-month-old DaJohn Ashley, who suffered burns on 22 percent of his body, and 2-year-old Makayla Dickerson, who suffered burns on 15 percent of her body; both children had to undergo multiple surgeries.

Other testimony Wednesday focused on claims by prosecution witnesses that Tata intimidated students and school administrators when she was in high school.

Sandra Wilson, an assistant principal at the high school where Tata enrolled after her arson case, testified that she had to discipline Tata several times, including once for forging grades.

"She had a presence about her that was very intimidating to other people," Wilson said.

Wilson said that after she disciplined Tata for the forged grades, Tata tried to follow her home one night from school.

"I didn't want her to know where I live ... I was shook up" by the incident, said Wilson, who added that Tata eventually stopped following her.

Testimony is scheduled to resume Thursday.

Tata was charged with four counts of felony murder along with charges of abandoning a child and reckless injury to a child. But but her trial was only for the murder count in connection to the death of 16-month-old Elias Castillo.

During a break in testimony Wednesday, Elias' grandmother, Rossi Castillo, said she hopes Tata gets the maximum punishment.

"She deserves life in prison so she doesn't do any more harm," she said.

RECOMMENDED: Are you a helicopter parent? Take the quiz

Copyright 2012 The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.