How music newcomers are changing the rules for body image

There's a crop of newcomers – young women including Billie Eilish, Snail Mail, and Soccer Mommy – who favor simple, thrift-store clothing 

Amy Harris/Invision/AP
Billie Eilish performs at the Coachella Music & Arts Festival at the Empire Polo Club April 13, 2019, in Indio, California.

Dear Reader,

Clairo (real name Claire Cottrill) isn’t one for the multiple wardrobe changes favored by many pop stars. The songwriter behind the viral hit “Pretty Girl” mostly wears baggy sweatshirts and jeans. She’s among a crop of newcomers – young women including Billie Eilish, Snail Mail, Soccer Mommy, and Marika Hackman – who favor simple, thrift-store clothing thrown on without much fuss (or ironing). 
 
It’s a striking change from the bedazzled leotards, ringmaster suits, and even metallic robot armor sported by the likes of Taylor Swift, Beyoncé, Iggy Azalea, and Ariana Grande. Or the kitsch garments modeled by Katy Perry or Lady Gaga, who once wore a dress made entirely out of meat. But then heavily stylized clothing has always conveyed an implicit image: Stars, they’re not like us. And that’s as true of male musicians who’ve played up their wardrobe choices – think Lil Nas X, David Bowie, Kanye West, Prince, Elton John, or any member of Mötley Crüe.

By contrast, these new stars seem to be conveying the idea that they’re ordinary, relatable, unpretentious. When Ms. Eilish, whose song “Bad Guy” just dethroned Lil Nas’ X’s “Old Town Road” as the No. 1 single in the United States (Aug. 24), appeared on the cover of Rolling Stone, she eschewed a sexualized, body-focused appearance. 

Is this a turning of the fashion wheel akin to the moment when Nirvana, with their T-shirts and torn jeans, displaced the ’80s generation of pop and rock stars adorned in spandex and shoulder pads? We’ll see. But it’s refreshing to observe how these iGen pop stars are keen to keep the focus on their music.

Stephen Humphries, culture writer 

To subscribe to our free Culture & Learning newsletter, sign up here.

For a student subscription to The Monitor visit: csmonitor.com/student.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.