New 'Finding Dory' trailer: What made 'Nemo' such a hit?

'Finding Dory,' a sequel to the 2003 smash hit 'Finding Nemo,' comes out this June. What helped the original movie do so well at the box office?

A new trailer has been released for the Pixar film “Finding Dory,” a “Finding Nemo” sequel that is scheduled to be released this June.

“Dory” features the return of “Nemo” actors Ellen DeGeneres (Dory) and Albert Brooks (Marlin) as well as new additions such as Kaitlin Olson, Ty Burrell, Diane Keaton, and Ed O’Neill.

The film centers on Dory’s efforts to find her family as well as encountering old friends and, judging from the trailer, also meeting some humans.

With “Dory,” Pixar has crafted a sequel to one of its biggest hits, a movie that is still one of the studio’s highest-grossing films more than 10 years later. (Only “Inside Out” and “Toy Story 3” have made more domestically than “Nemo.”)

What made the fishy film such a big hit when it was released in the summer of 2003? 

Release date certainly helped. “Finding Nemo,” “Inside Out,” and “Toy Story 3” were all released in the summer, a time of year when parents are no doubt looking for an all-ages feature. It’s not until you get to the sixth-highest-grossing Pixar movie, “The Incredibles,” that you find one that didn’t open during the warmer months. 

Against a backdrop of action-filled movies, a Pixar movie can stand out as something different. “Inside” proved to be a steady performer during the summer, even coming in at number one during the competitive July 4 weekend. 

Media analyst Paul Dergarabedian told Variety at the time that newer movies like “Terminator: Genisys” found it difficult going against “Inside” and “Jurassic World.”

"Those two holdover films are tough to open against because they are still drawing all demographics,” he explained.

Critical acclaim also contributed to the success of “Nemo,” which later won the Oscar for Best Animated Movie. As Gregory M. Lamb wrote at the time for The Christian Science Monitor, " 'Finding Nemo' is going to make a big splash with young children. And parents or grandparents who dive in with them are likely to have a great time, too… [an] animated delight." 

Steve Jobs, the CEO of Pixar when "Nemo" was released, also pointed out that Pixar's "brand" had become a selling point, Wall Street Journal writer Bruce Orwall noted at the time.

The studio had already released both “Toy Story” and its sequel as well as the popular film “Monsters, Inc.,” among other successful movies.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.