'Eddie the Eagle': Is the film another inspirational sports movie?

'Eddie' stars Taran Egerton as a real-life British athlete who became a ski jumper. What place does the inspirational sports drama have at the modern multiplex?

|
Matt Sayles/Invision/AP
'Eddie the Eagle' stars Taran Egerton (r.) and Hugh Jackman (l.).

The newest inspirational sports drama comes to theaters with the film “Eddie the Eagle,” which stars Taran Egerton and Hugh Jackman.

“Eddie” is based on the true story of 1980s athlete Eddie Edwards, who can’t make it as a downhill skier and so decides to attempt to compete in ski jumping at the Winter Olympics. 

The film co-stars Christopher Walken.

The genre to which “Eddie” belongs, the inspirational sports film, is one that has existed for decades. Some of the most famous examples include the 1976 movie “Rocky,” 1986’s “Hoosiers,” and the 1993 movie “Rudy.” 

Movies from past decades, rather than more contemporary films, often top the lists of the best inspirational sports films of all time. Rolling Stone staff, for example, selected such movies as the 1994 documentary “Hoop Dreams,” “Rocky,” and the 1980 movie “Raging Bull” as some of their top sports films, while USA Today writer Chris Chase chose “Hoosiers” and the 1989 film “Field of Dreams” as some of his selections for the best sports movies ever. 

Viewers have been won over by some recent sports movies, however. Within the past 10 years, there have been several box office hits that fall into this genre. This past November, the “Rocky” movie “Creed” became a big hit. The film “42,” which came out in 2013 and told the story of Jackie Robinson breaking the color barrier in Major League Baseball, also became a success at the box office.

Boxing in particular is always popular. Like "Creed,” the 2010 movie “The Fighter,” which told the story of real-life boxer Micky Ward, was a financial success. 

Like any genre, some inspirational sports films don’t succeed – the movie “Race,” which tells the story of Olympic athlete Jesse Owens and came out earlier this month, is not doing well at the box office so far, and the past couple of years have seen a string of movies that did not become big hits, including 2014’s “Draft Day,” "When the Game Stands Tall,” and “Million Dollar Arm.”

But for those hits that did do well, why do audiences keep returning to this genre? One aspect of their potential appeal is clear: they’re about sports, and sports are popular. Look no further than football dominating in the broadcast TV ratings every year. 

In addition, positive storylines no doubt provide an uplifting experience for moviegoers. 

“Themes of inspiration and courage, that’s also meaningful to us,” Disney president of production Sean Bailey said in an interview with TheWrap. (Disney released such films as "Million Dollar Arm.") “Obviously we want to succeed financially, but it’s also meaningful to us at Disney to put movies out there with themes and ideas at their core.”

However, sports movies do come with a risk today. As international box office returns become more and more important, these films that deal with US sports don’t always appeal around the world, write Todd Cunningham and Lucas Shaw of TheWrap.

“Because even domestic hits like ‘Moneyball’ didn’t play strongly overseas, there’s extra pressure to have a story line compelling enough to convince backers that a project can appeal to non-fans,” Cunningham and Shaw wrote.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Eddie the Eagle': Is the film another inspirational sports movie?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Culture-Cafe/2016/0223/Eddie-the-Eagle-Is-the-film-another-inspirational-sports-movie
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe