Mystery surrounds the upcoming J.J. Abrams movie '10 Cloverfield Lane'

The moviegoing public got a surprise when a mysterious trailer for a movie titled '10 Cloverfield Lane' was released. Like the 2008 movie 'Cloverfield,' it's produced by Abrams of 'Star Wars: The Force Awakens.'

Mario Anzuoni/Reuters
J.J. Abrams is a producer on the movie '10 Cloverfield Lane.'

The moviegoing public has gotten a surprise from J.J. Abrams. 

The director, whose most recent film, “Star Wars: The Force Awakens,” just became the highest-grossing movie domestically of all time without adjusting for inflation, has produced a new movie that may have some connection with the 2008 movie he produced, “Cloverfield.” 

A trailer has been released for a film titled “10 Cloverfield Lane.” Like the 2008 film, it’s produced by Abrams. And moviegoers won’t have to wait long – it’s coming out this March. 

Is it a sequel to “Cloverfield”? What does the plot involve? 

Little is known about the new movie. The trailer shows actors, including John Goodman of “Love the Coopers” and “The Returned” actress Mary Elizabeth Winstead, in what looks like some underground area. Then Winstead’s character attempts to escape, despite Goodman’s warnings about what lies beyond their sanctuary.

The unusual marketing campaign for “10 Cloverfield Lane” echoes that of the 2008 movie “Cloverfield,” which was filmed found-footage style and centered on a strange creature attacking New York City. Trailers for the 2008 film showed only fragmented clips of people fleeing and an unseen threat. 

Secretive or strange marketing campaigns can certainly help a movie. The 1999 film “Blair Witch Project,” which also used a found-footage conceit, sparked moviegoers’ interest with a mysterious website and the idea that the movie depicted true events. “Blair” went on to be a box office smash. 

With the 2006 movie “Borat,” some moviegoers probably knew actor Sacha Baron Cohen from his shows like “Da Ali G Show,” but he was hardly a household name. Following the unusual promotion for the movie, in which Cohen appeared in character on various occasions, the film also went on to be a box office hit. 

Abrams is no stranger to secretive movie promotion – impressively few plot details about “Star Wars,” one of the most anticipated movies of all time, came out before the movie’s release.

He’s also kept plot points secret with high-profile movies like the 2013 film “Star Trek Into Darkness,” where Abrams and his stars kept the identity of the villain portrayed by Benedict Cumberbatch a secret. While some fans were displeased with what they saw as confusing denials by those involved with the movie, the film went on to do well at the box office.

Whether it’s connected to the original movie or not, the use of the word “Cloverfield” in the title is sure to pique moviegoers’ interest. And the unusual marketing campaign may also attract moviegoers as innovative methods have in the past.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.