'Star Wars: The Force Awakens': How it scored big box office numbers

'Force' was released on Dec. 18 and has experienced record-breaking box office success since. The movie stars Daisy Ridley, John Boyega, Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher, and Mark Hamill.

Film Frame/Disney/Lucasfilm/AP
'Star Wars: The Force Awakens' stars Daisy Ridley.

After all the anticipation for the newest “Star Wars” film, “Star Wars: The Force Awakens,” its massive box office numbers in its debut weekend are most likely not a surprise. 

“Force” grossed about $247 million domestically after opening on Dec. 18. It set a worldwide record, grossing about $528 million.

By comparison, a recent movie that experienced huge success, this summer’s “Jurassic World,” grossed more than $208 million domestically and $524 million worldwide when it opened. 

The movie was the newest “Star Wars” movie in 10 years and the first in more than 30 to feature original series actors Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher, and Mark Hamill. 

Industry watchers are now wondering whether the newest “Star Wars” movie can beat the box office numbers held by director James Cameron’s films “Avatar,” which came out in 2009, and “Titanic,” which was released in 1997. The two are the highest- and second-highest-grossing movies of all time domestically, respectively (and not adjusted for inflation).

What makes these movies succeed? In order to attain these kinds of numbers, a movie must appeal to multiple demographics and perhaps even attract repeat visitors (“Titanic” in particular is famous for people having gone to see it more than once). 

Will “Star Wars” have moviegoers coming back? Positive reviews and reactions from fans may mean that those enjoyed the story will return. After bad buzz for the movie, it’s doubtful that many moviegoers returned to see, for example, the 1999 “Star Wars” movie “Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace.” 

In addition, it seems that “Force” has attracted demographically diverse audience members already. The audience for the movie this past weekend was 66 percent male and 47 percent were under the age of 25, according to movie data tracking company Rentrak. That last number shows that the movie didn’t attract only viewers who can remember when the last movie with Ford, Fisher, and Hamill, 1983’s “Star Wars: Episode VI – Return of the Jedi,” was in theaters. 

If “Star Wars” can beat both “Titanic” and “Avatar” to become the highest-grossing movie of all time, it will have been a movie that became a success after capitalizing on previous popularity for a series – a move similar to the success for "Jurassic World," which is now the third-highest-grossing film of all time domestically. By contrast, “Titanic” and “Avatar” were both movies that succeeded more with the power of word-of-mouth. “Titanic” is, of course, based on historical events, but its characters are original and “Avatar” is an original story. In both cases, the movies’ groundbreaking special effects no doubt attracted interest. 

By contrast, “Star Wars” represents the culmination of almost 40 years of a successful movie series. The “Star Wars” fanbase seems to have only grown over the years. After a prequel film trilogy that was poorly received by most fans, there was enormous appetite for a “Star Wars” movie that was done well.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Star Wars: The Force Awakens': How it scored big box office numbers
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today