American Music Awards: Who won the big prizes?

Winners at this year's American Music Awards included singer Taylor Swift and the band One Direction. How do viewers look at American Music Award winners compared to, for example, the Grammy Awards or the MTV Video Music Awards?

Matt Sayles/Invision/AP
American Music Award winners included the band One Direction, which includes members Liam Payne (l.), Harry Styles (center), and Louis Tomlinson (r.).

This year’s American Music Awards honored such artists as the band One Direction and singer Taylor Swift.

The ceremony was hosted by singer Jennifer Lopez and One Direction won the prestigious artist of the year prize. Meanwhile, Swift won the song of the year award for her track “Blank Space.” 

The prize for favorite male artist in the pop/rock category went to Ed Sheeran, while Ariana Grande captured the favorite female artist in pop/rock award. One Direction also won the favorite duo or group award in the pop/rock category and Swift’s “1989” won the favorite album in the same category. 

Singer Sam Hunt won the favorite new artist award, while Justin Bieber, Skrillex, and Diplo won the award for best collaboration for their song “Where Are Ü Now.” 

In the country genre, Carrie Underwood won in the favorite female artist category and Luke Bryan won the favorite male artist prize. Florida Georgia Line won the favorite duo or group award and the favorite album prize also went to the group for their work “Anything Goes.” 

Nicki Minaj won the favorite rap/hip-hop artist prize and her album “The Pinkprint” also took the favorite rap/hip-hop album award.

For the soul/R&B category, The Weeknd won the favorite male artist prize and Rihanna won the favorite female artist award. The Weeknd also took the favorite album award in that category for his work “Beauty Behind the Madness.” 

Singer Enrique Iglesias won the favorite Latin artist prize, while the band Fall Out Boy won the award for favorite alternative rock band and Swift won the award for favorite adult contemporary artist. Calvin Harris won in the category of favorite electronic dance music artist, while Casting Crowns took the favorite contemporary inspirational prize. The movie “Pitch Perfect 2” won in the favorite soundtrack category. 

The AMAs, which air on ABC, are decided by fans, with the public casting their votes through Twitter and the AMAs website, among other ways. The People’s Choice Awards function similarly, as evidenced by their name, and most of the MTV Video Music Awards are also voted on by fans. But prizes for such other awards shows as the Grammys, the Billboard Music Awards, and the Country Music Association Awards are distributed by those working in the industry – for example, Grammys voters include producers and singers. 

Which is more prestigious? The Grammys, in which artists are given awards by their peers, are often called the most important music awards in the U.S. As for popularity, the Grammys ratings for this past year were low for the awards ceremony but garnered more than 25 million viewers total. In this, the Grammys remain king. For the 2014 AMAs, the ceremony brought in more than 11 million viewers. The MTV VMAs got more than 9 million earlier this year.

Why would there be this big difference? The Grammys have been held since 1959, so they’ve had a long time to make themselves an important part of American culture. The American Music Awards arrived in 1974. In addition, viewers may be impressed by the fact that peers are awarding these prizes to the recipients rather than voters. Those in the music industry presumably know their work. If they say someone like Sam Smith made the best record of the year (he won earlier this year for his song “Stay With Me”), viewers most likely assume a lot of music industry knowledge is going into that decision.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.