Weekend box office: 'Spectre' on top as 'By the Sea' treads water

James Bond and Charlie Brown were the champions of the box office again this past weekend. What's behind the underwhelming performance of films like 'Sea' and the drama 'The 33'?

Jonathan Olley/Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Pictures/Columbia Pictures/EON Productions/AP
'Spectre' stars Daniel Craig.

It’s not easy to take down James Bond. 

The new Bond movie “Spectre” came in first at the box office this weekend, which was its second in theaters. The new animated movie “The Peanuts Movie,” which was also a holdover from last weekend, placed second. “Spectre” took in more than $35 million, while “Peanuts” grossed more than $24 million.

New movies didn’t fare overly well at the box office. The new film that did the best was the family holiday drama “Love the Coopers,” but the movie only took in a bit more than $8 million over the weekend, placing third but coming in far behind “Peanuts” at second place. 

The movie “The 33,” which was based on the true story of Chilean miners who were rescued in 2010, came in fifth, behind “The Martian.” “33” grossed more than $5 million.

Meanwhile, the drama “By the Sea,” which was directed by Angelina Jolie Pitt and starred her and Brad Pitt, did not set sail auspiciously. It debuted in only 10 theaters and made less than $1 million.

What made movies like “Coopers,” “33,” and “Sea” underperform? Poor reviews are likely one culprit. All of them received negative notices from critics, so even if the star-studded casts of “Coopers” or “Sea” or the inspiring real-life basis of “33” attracted moviegoers originally, they may have decided against going after hearing from reviewers.

In addition, this fall’s box office may provide a cautionary tale for how movie studios should release smaller projects. The acclaimed drama “Spotlight,” which tells the true story of the Boston Globe’s reporting on the Catholic Church sex abuse scandal, has been in limited release. It’s slowly expanding its locations and so industry watchers are more impressed with its box office performance, with Entertainment Weekly writer Devan Coggan calling the movie’s results so far “solid” and Forbes writer Scott Mendelson finding its gross to be a “terrific” result. 

By contrast, some recent smaller movies may have opened wide or expanded too quickly. Some were surprised by the lackluster box office performance of the movie “Steve Jobs,” which stars Michael Fassbender as the tech giant. “Jobs” director Danny Boyle said in an interview that he thinks the film should have opened slowly, expanding to more locations gradually, as good word-of-mouth increased. This is the strategy “Spotlight” is following. “It’s very disappointing that when it was released wide across America it didn’t really work," he said. So it’s retreated back now to the main cities. It’s very easy in hindsight [to speculate], but I think it’s probably that we released it too wide too soon.”

However, the crucial ingredient for that strategy is good reviews. Even if a movie like “33,” “Sea,” or a previous underperformer like “Burnt” had opened more slowly, they all still got negative reviews. Opening in fewer locations initially would probably not have helped the films.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Weekend box office: 'Spectre' on top as 'By the Sea' treads water
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today