'The Intern': Why didn't Nancy Meyers want to direct a romantic comedy?

'Intern,' the newest movie directed by Nancy Meyers of 'It's Complicated' and 'The Holiday,' centers on the platonic relationship between a young woman and an older man and Meyers recently said, 'I felt sort of done with the romantic story.' What's happening with love at the multiplex?

Courtesy Warner Bros. Pictures/AP
'The Intern' stars Anne Hathaway (l.) and Robert De Niro (r.).

“The Intern,” the newest film directed by Nancy Meyers, opens on Sept. 24 and centers on a retiree who works as an intern at a fashion company run by a young woman.

The film stars Robert De Niro and Anne Hathaway and those who know Ms. Meyers best from her past hits like “It’s Complicated,” which stars Meryl Streep as a woman romantically involved with characters played by Alec Baldwin and Steve Martin, and “What Women Want,” which stars Mel Gibson as a man who falls in love with his co-worker (Helen Hunt), may be surprised by the platonic relationship at the center of the film.

But Meyers, who also wrote “Intern," “Complicated” and the romantic comedies “The Holiday,” and “Something’s Gotta Give,” recently said she didn’t want to write another romantic relationship. “I felt sort of done with the romantic story,” she said. “It just wasn’t what I was feeling. And I felt I’d covered that subject pretty well: to fall in love, and out of love, and be divorced, be [‘Holiday’ star] Cameron Diaz’s age, or be Meryl Streep’s age. So I thought, A relationship between a man and a woman that’s not romantic, this is interesting. I’ve never done that.”

As Meyers looks at a non-romantic relationship in her movie, it’s been several years since a romantic comedy became a huge hit at the box office. The newest film to be in the top 10 of the highest-grossing romantic comedies of all time domestically is 2009’s “The Proposal.” 2005’s “Hitch,” 2007’s “Knocked Up,” and 2008’s “Sex and the City” (which also came with viewers’ pre-awareness of the TV show) are also on there. But otherwise, all the other movies are clustered during the 1990s or the beginning of the 2000s.

However, we are coming off a summer where a traditional romantic comedy just became a hit. Amy Schumer’s “Trainwreck,” which she starred in and wrote, was one of the success stories of the summer. But a lot of films in the genre have missed recently rather than hit. This year’s “The Longest Ride” and “Aloha” didn’t do well financially, nor did 2014’s “That Awkward Moment,” “About Last Night,” “Endless Love,” “Blended,” and “Think Like a Man Too.”

Perhaps audiences are looking for something different from the genre. Romantic comedy films that have done well recently all have a slight twist on the genre. (As Meyers herself noted, in “Trainwreck,” “[director Judd Apatow] and Amy turned it on its ear by switching the roles – he falls in love, she can’t commit.”) In “Proposal,” Ryan Reynolds’ character falls in love with his boss, played by Sandra Bullock, and the two get engaged at the beginning of the film, before they’re in love. 2005’s “Hitch” stars Will Smith as a coach to men in relationships who then finds he can’t conduct himself well when he’s involved in a relationship of his own.

With Meyers seemingly taking a break from the genre, if romantic comedies will get made over the next few years, others will have to take up the slack.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.