Christopher Guest becomes newest A-lister to team up with Netflix

Guest's new movie 'Mascots' will reportedly be released by the streaming service in 2016. Other celebrities like Cary Fukunaga, Brad Pitt, Adam Sandler, and Pee-Wee Herman have also joined up with Netflix for various projects.

Chris Pizzello/Invision/AP
Christopher Guest speaks during the HBO Winter TCA Press Tour in 2013.

Director Christopher Guest has become the newest Hollywood personality to team up with Netflix. 

Guest’s new movie “Mascots” will reportedly premiere on the streaming service. The movie will center on the World Mascot Association championships, where men and women with “big heads and furry suits” will vie for the title.

Guest is primarily known for directing such mockumentary-style films as “Best in Show,” “Waiting for Guffman,” and “For Your Consideration.” He acted in many of those films and has also appeared in such films as “This Is Spinal Tap” (which he co-wrote), “The Princess Bride,” and “Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian.”

Netflix has been acquiring various high-profile original work recently. It’s already known for the success of its original TV programming, including the shows “House of Cards,” “Orange Is the New Black,” “Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt,” and “Daredevil.” And now, in addition to Guest’s movie, actor Brad Pitt is working with the streaming service on the movie “War Machine” and Cary Fukunaga of “True Detective” is making the movie “Beasts of No Nation” with them. In some of these instances, the movies will be in theaters and available on Netflix. A sequel to the movie “Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon” is also being made with Netflix.

In addition, the streaming service is working with comedians Adam Sandler and Kevin James to make original films. Netflix reportedly signed on to make at least four movies with Sandler. And Pee-Wee Herman is working with Netflix on a movie titled “Pee-Wee’s Big Holiday.” 

In addition to what this would mean for movie theaters if Netflix films caught on, it will be interesting to see what a (presumed) lack of data means for how Hollywood and critics receive films. Netflix is famously cagey when it comes to how TV shows are performing in terms of audience. One of the only hints we may get is when a show is canceled, as with the Netflix shows “Lilyhammer,” which recently met its end, and "Hemlock Grove," though even then, many factors could contribute to the show ending rather than simply low viewership. 

But for good or ill, opening weekend grosses are a large part of how Hollywood views a film, especially when it comes to blockbusters (indie films are often given more time to grow). A movie by an actor by Sandler would certainly be looked at this way, as evidenced by the negative box office performance of his most recent film, this summer’s “Pixels.”

If this information is taken away from the public, prospective viewers may base their decision on whether to watch a movie on reviews from critics and fellow viewers rather than a perception of a movie being a success or a failure. This most likely wouldn’t change much behind the scenes, however. Netflix, like any other company, would most likely want to know their investment was a wise one and would probably hesitate before committing to another film with an actor or a director if a movie didn’t perform numbers-wise as they had hoped it would.

Guest's new movie will debut in 2016.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.