Can 'Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation' survive the crowded summer season?

The 'Mission: Impossible' franchise has often performed well at the box office, but audiences have seen a lot of action movies arrive at the multiplex this summer. The new movie with Tom Cruise arrives on July 31.

David James/Paramount Pictures/AP
'Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation' stars Tom Cruise (l.) and Rebecca Ferguson (r.).

The newest “Mission: Impossible” film will be released on July 31, heading into the competitive summer season. 

The “Mission” films star Tom Cruise as Ethan Hunt, who works for the Impossible Mission Force. The movies are based on the 1960s TV show of the same name and the first film was released in 1996, with a new movie appearing every several years since then. The newest, “Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation,” is the fifth. 

In the upcoming movie “Rogue,” the government is telling Ethan and his group (portrayed by actors Simon Pegg and Jeremy Renner, among others) to retire, but Ethan and his IMF group are still determined to take down villains.

The first two “Mission” movies were big hits, with the second, 2000’s “Mission: Impossible II,” grossing even more than the first film. The third faltered a bit, grossing far less domestically than the second movie did.

But if there was any doubt that the franchise couldn’t continue in a strong way creatively, or that audiences didn’t want to see more “Mission” movies, the fourth movie, 2011’s “Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol,” put them to rest. The film became the seventh-highest-grossing movie of the year (compared to the third movie becoming the fourteenth-highest of its year) and the film was also highly acclaimed, with some reviewers even selecting it as one of the best movies to be released that year, a rarity for a mainstream action movie. 

So is “Rogue” a guaranteed hit? The “Mission: Impossible” series name is still recognizable to many and so fans will still doubtless turn out. But “Ghost” was released during the holiday season, a somewhat unlikely choice. Other movies to be released that month included the romantic comedy “New Year’s Eve,” the comedy “The Sitter,” the animated film “Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked,” and such awards season bait as “Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy,” “War Horse,” and “The Iron Lady.” One of the only movies close to it in target audience and genre was the Robert Downey Jr. sequel “Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows.” 

The summer movie season is, of course, a much more crowded place when it comes to action-heavy movies. Audiences can currently choose from such films as the superhero movie “Ant-Man,” “Jurassic World,” or “Terminator Genisys” (or “Pixels,” if video game action is their thing), to name only the movies currently in the domestic box office top ten. This summer has also seen the release of other action-heavy movies like “Avengers: Age of Ultron,” “Mad Max: Fury Road,” and “San Andreas 3D.” And recent Cruise-starring action movies that were released in the summer like 2014's "Edge of Tomorrow" and 2010's "Knight and Day" have faltered at the box office, though they obviously came without the "Mission: Impossible" name attached.

We’ll see this weekend if “Rogue” can survive in the crowded summer movie season.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.