Is 'Xena: Warrior Princess' returning to TV?

Original series star Lucy Lawless recently said, 'Reinvigorate that franchise… They're fools not to bring [Xena] back.'

G. Short/MCA TV/AP
'Xena: Warrior Princess,' starring Lucy Lawless, aired from 1995 to 2001.

Is a new version of the "Xena: Warrior Princess" TV series coming soon? 

Hollywood Reporter claims that NBC is working on a reboot of "Xena," the historical fantasy series that aired during the 1990s and early 2000s. The show starred Lucy Lawless and Renee O’Connor and was a spin-off of the program "Hercules: The Legendary Journeys." Xena was a fighter who worked to aid the helpless, accompanied by bard Gabrielle. 

Despite the rumors, fans shouldn't get too excited yet – Lawless herself, who is married to "Xena" co-creator Robert Tapert, tweeted that nothing is happening right now.

But the timing could be right for NBC or another network to move forward with a new version of the show

The original "Xena" series ended in 2001, the same year that "The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring," the first installment in the Oscar-winning movie series based on J.R.R. Tolkien’s books, hit theaters, and fantasy and science fiction films are still being influenced by the "Rings" films today.

Those who doubted that there was an appetite for fantasy films, let alone medieval fantasy, were quickly proven wrong by the success of “Rings” – the first film was the second-highest-grossing movie of the year, behind only “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone,” another fantasy film, though the “Potter” series is set closer to our own time period. The second “Rings” film, “The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers,” was also the second-grossing film of the year in which it was released and the third, “The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King,” was the highest-grossing film of 2003. 

Meanwhile, the TV series “Game of Thrones” has become the most-watched HBO show of all time, ahead of such culture-dominating shows as “The Sopranos” and “Sex and the City.”

While Ms. Lawless debunked the current rumors, she has said in the past that she wouldn’t say no to being involved in a new version – far from it.

Lawless discussed reviving the show earlier this month, saying, “I don't know what the holdup is. It's about who's got the rights [to the series]… find who's got the rights… pay it. It's better to have 80 percent of something than 100 percent of nothing. Don't waste this opportunity. Reinvigorate that franchise… They're fools not to bring it back.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.