Amanda Peterson starred in '80s teen comedy 'Can't Buy Me Love'

Peterson, who reportedly died earlier this week, led the cast of 'Love' as a popular high school student who dates Patrick Dempsey's character. The 80s are still remembered as a classic time for movies aimed at teenagers.

Actress Amanda Peterson, who appeared in such films as the 1982 movie “Annie,” 1985’s “Explorers,” and the 1994 movie “Windrunner,” has reportedly died at her home in Greely, Colo. at the age of 43.

Ms. Peterson is often best remembered for her role in the 1987 film “Can’t Buy Me Love,” in which she portrayed popular cheerleader Cindy and co-starred opposite Patrick Dempsey. In the film, Dempsey’s character Ronald pays Cindy to pose as his girlfriend, but the two end up being drawn to one another.

Dempsey, of course, starred on the long-running ABC medical drama “Grey’s Anatomy” and recently appeared in such films as “Transformers: Dark of the Moon” and “Valentine’s Day.” “Love” also co-starred actor Seth Green, who stars in the Fox animated sitcom “Family Guy.”   

Peterson’s most well-known movie “Love” was released in the heyday of 80s teen comedy films (“Love” came out the year after the movies “Pretty in Pink” and “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off,” and the same year as the movie “Some Kind of Wonderful”) and “Love” helped cement the decade’s reputation as a golden era of films aimed at teenagers. The film was remade in 2003 as the movie “Love Don’t Cost a Thing” with actors Nick Cannon and Christina Milian, but the film was not well-received by critics. 

“Love” is now cited by some fans as one of the best teen movies to come out of the era, with the website WhatCulture naming “Love” as one of the best underrated movies of the ‘80s and calling it an “’80s classic,” while TheWrap writer Matt Donnelly called the film “beloved … the film sits in a canon of ’80s fare alongside John Hughes and other angst masters” and Fandango writer Chuck Walton wrote that the film is one of “the essential ‘80s teen movies … [part of the] cream of the crop of teen movie nirvana.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to