'Independence Day' sequel title unveiled: What can we expect?

Director Roland Emmerich recently discussed the 'Independence Day' sequel. What made the original movie so unforgettable?

Joel Ryan/Invision/AP
The new 'Independence Day' film will star Jeff Goldblum.

The first “Independence Day” movie, released in 1996, centers on an alien invasion of Earth. Characters from different American cities mobilize against the threat and join forces to (spoiler alert!) defeat the alien invaders. Stars of the film included Will Smith, Jeff Goldblum, Bill Pullman, Mary McDonnell, Vivica A. Fox, and many others.

And after 20 years, it's time for a sequel: “Independence Day: Resurgence.”

Director Roland Emmerich, who directed the first film and is returning for the sequel, discussed the thinking behind the title at a recent press conference. “We call it, in the film, the War of '96,” he said of the first movie’s events. “It’s like a … generation that’s unified, and that’s amazing to see a world come together with a common enemy. That’s a resurgence.”

Cinema Blend posted an official synopsis of the new movie: “Independence Day was just the beginning. We always knew the [aliens] were coming back…. Using recovered alien technology, the nations of Earth have collaborated on an immense defense program to protect the planet. But nothing can prepare us for the aliens’ advanced and unprecedented force. Only the ingenuity of a few brave men and women can bring our world back from the brink of extinction.” 

Returning cast members include Mr. Goldblum, Mr. Pullman, Ms. Fox, and Brent Spiner, while newbies include Liam Hemsworth of the “Hunger Games” films, Maika Monroe of “It Follows,” and “When the Game Stands Tall” actor Jessie Usher. Mr. Usher is playing the son of Fox, according to Cinema Blend, while Ms. Monroe plays Pullman's daughter and Mr. Hemsworth is a fighter pilot who now works on the moon.

“Independence Day: Resurgence” is scheduled for release in June 2016.

The original film was the highest-grossing movie of 1996, according to Box Office Mojo, but it wasn’t well-received by critics – it currently holds a score of 59 out of 100 on the review aggregator website Metacritic. So what kept the movie in the public’s mind over the last 20 years? Matt Barone of Complex called it “tremendously ludicrous yet undeniably awesome … every self-respecting movie buff succumbs to cinematic junk food once in a while. 'Independence Day' is a king-size Butterfinger bar.” 

Variety writer Rachel Abrams agreed that the movie is simply enjoyable, calling it her “favorite movie of all time.… I’ve never had more fun in a movie theater than I did during ‘Independence Day.’ ”

Daniel D. Snyder of the Atlantic, who describes “Independence Day” as “the best Fourth of July movie," wriites, "Of course, in 1996 it was still just mindless fun, but watching it now, it somehow feels even more outlandish....Watching 'Independence Day' today is like peering back through time to an era where we could overcome any obstacle simply by hurling a bunch of fighter jets at it and drop a few bombs. Of course, there was never a time when things were that simple, but there certainly a time when we thought they could be."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Independence Day' sequel title unveiled: What can we expect?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today