'Maleficent' sequel: Will Angelina Jolie come back?

A sequel is reportedly in the works for the 2014 Disney movie 'Maleficent.' Will a second movie be satisfying creatively and present the audience with a fresh new story?

|
Frank Connor/Disney/AP
'Maleficent' stars Angelina Jolie.

A sequel to Disney’s hit movie “Maleficent” is reportedly in the works.

“Maleficent” was released in 2014 and starred Angelina Jolie as the villain from the “Sleeping Beauty” fairy tale. The movie co-starred Elle Fanning, Imelda Staunton, and Sharlto Copley and served as an origin story for Maleficent, framing the narrative to explain her actions as a vengeful fairy who casts an evil spell on Sleeping Beauty.

The movie was a box office hit, becoming the eighth-highest-grossing movie of the year, according to the website Box Office Mojo, and according to Deadline, a sequel is now in the works. 

According to Deadline, Linda Woolverton, who wrote the original film, is on board to write the sequel. The big question is, will Jolie return? Many critics praised her performance, with Monitor film critic Peter Rainer writing of the film, “At least Disney was smart enough to cast Jolie. She has a genuinely heroic presence.” Deadline writer Mike Fleming Jr. writes, “I’m told the studio is keeping Jolie in the loop and that the sequel will be written for her to reprise.” 

USA Today asked Jolie back when the first movie came out whether she’d be interested in reprising her role and she replied, “Possibly. I don’t know. I enjoyed it. I just feel like we did this one thoroughly and I don’t think there’d be another. I feel like this is the one. If I was going to ever do a Disney one, this is the one I wanted to do. And I think we’ve done it well.” 

A sequel to “Maleficent” was easy to predict. But often, when fairy tales are turned into movies, the fairy tales involved get a new spin. (Yes, the basis of movies like “Maleficent” and an upcoming “Tinkerbell” movie are fairy tales or classic books, but we take what we can get creatively in remake-happy Hollywood.) If Disney announced, for example, that it’s doing a revisionist take on “Aladdin” villain Jafar – something that doesn’t seem impossible after the success of movies like “Maleficent” and “Cinderella” – at least the “Aladdin” story is being rewritten in some way. But a “Maleficent” sequel seems more likely be just that, a sequel, without a fresh take on the story, because a world has already been created in the first film. 

Fans will have to hope that a new “Maleficent” movie would be as satisfying creatively as possible and not just be a retread of a film we’ve already seen.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Maleficent' sequel: Will Angelina Jolie come back?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Culture-Cafe/2015/0616/Maleficent-sequel-Will-Angelina-Jolie-come-back
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe