'Fantastic Four' latest trailer: Why fans should feel good about reboot

The upcoming version of 'Fantastic Four' is coming at a time when Marvel has shown that most of its movies will be satisfying creatively. In addition, the new film is helmed by a director who has already shown he can make a mostly critically-praised movie about superheroes.

A new trailer for the upcoming “Fantastic Four” movie has more to offer fans.

While some components of the international “Fantastic” trailer are the same as a trailer already released, new sections of the international trailer include superhero the Human Torch (Michael B. Jordan) showing off his powers. Check out the full trailer above.

“Fantastic Four” stars Miles Teller of “The Divergent Series: Insurgent” as scientist Reed Richards, who becomes Mr. Fantastic, with the power to stretch; Kate Mara of “House of Cards” as Susan Storm, who becomes known as the Invisible Woman; “Turn” actor Jamie Bell as Ben Grimm, or the Thing, who develops thick skin and strength; and Mr. Jordan of “Fruitvale Station” as Johnny Storm, or the Human Torch, who can generate fire and be unharmed by it.

The “Fantastic Four” superhero team was adapted for film in 2005 with a movie starring actors Ioan Gruffudd, Jessica Alba, Michael Chiklis, and Chris Evans (who would later go on to play Captain America in the Marvel universe). However, the movie received poor reviews and a 2007 sequel, “Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer,” was also not critically well-received.

So what should make fans more confident about this iteration of the superhero group? For one, Marvel's recent track record. Before 2008's “Iron Man,” which was a box office smash and well-received critically, Marvel Studios did co-productions with other studios, and those co-productions are a mixed bag quality-wise. Movies like “X-Men,” “X-2,” “Spider-Man,” and “Spider-Man 2” were well-received, but films like “Daredevil,” “Hulk,” “Elektra,” “Ghost Rider,” "Spider-Man 3," and “X-Men: The Last Stand” didn't do as well with reviewers.

Marvel turned it around, though, with “Iron Man.” Since then, almost every movie has been mostly praised by reviewers, with “Iron Man 2” and the “Thor” movies being some exceptions. 

In addition, “Fantastic Four” director Josh Trank has already been mostly critically praised for his film take on superheroes – the director helmed the 2012 movie “Chronicle,” which follows a group of high school students (including one played by Jordan) who develop superpowers. Variety critic Peter Debruge wrote of the film, “Blending the found-footage fad with a chilling commentary on the effects of bullying, Josh Trank's 'Chronicle' presents as plausible a portrait of the way three teens might react to gaining psychic powers as one could hope… [the film includes] Max Landis' keen script (conceived in partnership with director Trank)… Trank's approach shows considerable ingenuity on a tight budget.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.