'Insurgent': Are YA dystopian movie adaptations on their way out?

'Insurgent' topped the box office but did not surpass the opening weekend gross for the first movie in the film series as some thought it might, while the newest installment of the dystopian powerhouse 'The Hunger Games' did not do as well as its predecessors. Are moviegoers getting tired of the young adult dystopian trend?

Andrew Cooper/Lionsgate/AP
'Insurgent' stars Shailene Woodley (r.) and Theo James (l.).

The second installment in the "Divergent" movie series, which is titled "Insurgent" and is based off the book of the same name by writer Veronica Roth, topped the box office this past weekend, coming in first over the Sean Penn action movie "The Gunman" and "Cinderella," Disney's live-action adaptation of their cartoon version of the story.

The opening-weekend gross of "Insurgent" is just about the same as 2014's "Divergent," according to the Associated Press. "Divergent" debuted with $54.6 million domestically and "Insurgent" bowed with $54 million. According to the AP, some industry observers thought "Insurgent" might gross more than the first film in its first weekend, but it did not.

Coming in at number one, "Insurgent" is far from a box office failure. But "The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1," which came out this past November, did less well on its opening weekend than both the first movie in the series, "The Hunger Games" and "The Hunger Games: Catching Fire," with "Mockingjay" grossing $123 million to the more than $152 million of "Hunger Games" and the more than $158 million of "Fire," according to Variety. Meanwhile, this August's movie "The Giver," which was based on the dystopian book of the same name, was considered a box office disappointment, opening with more than $12 million domestically, according to the website Buzzfeed. "The Maze Runner," which was based on a book of the same name by James Dashner, came out this fall and was considered a box office success, so is currently an exception.

But as for "Insurgent," it hasn't been well-reviewed – it currently holds a score of 42 out of 100 on the review aggregator website Metacritic – and some reviewers for "Insurgent" said that the dystopian setting is getting old. "The films, including the new 'Insurgent,' do so little to stray from well-worn YA paths," Associated Press writer Jake Coyle wrote of the series, while Rolling Stone critic Peter Travers found that the movie series "never loses the stale odor of also-ran" and Alonso Duralde of TheWrap called the new movie "overly familiar... not much makes this film stand out from its many competitors."

Some called the dystopian trend over in YA books themselves long ago – literary agent Barry Goldstein called the trend "dead" for books in a 2013 Monitor interview. Time will tell whether movies like "Maze" can keep it going or whether it's true at movie theaters, too.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.