Julianne Moore: The veteran nominee triumphs in a year of newbies

Moore won a Best Actress Oscar for her work in 'Still Alice' after having earned four previous nominations at the Academy Awards. Her fellow acting winners – 'Whiplash' actor J.K. Simmons, Patricia Arquette of 'Boyhood,' and 'The Theory of Everything' actor Eddie Redmayne – were not only first-time winners but also first-time nominees.

John Shearer/Invision/AP
Julianne Moore accepts the Oscar for Best Actress at the 2015 ceremony.

The rest of the winners for the acting prizes at the 2015 Oscars ceremony may have been new to the show, but actress Julianne Moore knew her way around the Academy Awards.

While Best Actor winner and “The Theory of Everything” actor Eddie Redmayne, “Boyhood” actress and Best Supporting Actress winner Patricia Arquette, and “Whiplash” actor and Best Supporting Actor winner J.K. Simmons were all first-time nominees, Moore had been nominated four times before at the Oscars, with her first nod coming in 1998 in the Best Supporting Actress category for the film “Boogie Nights.” 

Many seem to see Moore’s 2015 win as an overdue honor. “Julianne Moore Finally Wins Academy Award,” the Telegraph headline for the story about her win reads, while HitFix writer Kristopher Tapley wrote that “after… a career’s worth of bold, varied performances, Julianne Moore is finally an Oscar winner.” 

The movie “Still Alice,” in which Moore portrays a woman diagnosed with Alzheimer’s, was based off a novel by Lisa Genova. Monitor film critic Peter Rainer called Moore “startlingly good” in “Alice.”

Moore’s other Oscar nominations came for her 2000 role in “The End of the Affair,” for which she earned a Best Actress nod, and in 2003, when she was nominated in the Best Supporting Actress category for her role in “The Hours” and in the Best Actress category for the film “Far from Heaven.”

As one might imagine, being nominated in two categories in the same year in the acting categories is a rare feat. In achieving it, Moore is in the company of, among others, actress Jessica Lange, who was nominated for “Frances" and Tootsie”; Al Pacino, who earned nods for “Scent of a Woman” and “Glengarry Glen Ross”; and last year’s Best Actress winner Cate Blanchett, who at one point in her career earned nominations for the movies “Elizabeth: The Golden Age” and “I’m Not There."

Last year's Oscars acting categories were also a triumph of the newcomers. Best Actor winner Matthew McConaughey, Best Supporting Actress winner Lupita Nyong’o, and Best Supporting Actor winner Jared Leto were all first-time nominees. Best Actress winner Blanchett had not only been nominated before but had also won an Oscar previously in the Best Supporting Actress category for the movie “The Aviator.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.