2015 Oscar nominations: Who got snubbed?

For some movie aficionados, it's not who got nominated for an Oscar. It's who didn't. What happened, for example, to The LEGO Movie?

(Photo by Dan Steinberg/Invision/AP)
Actor Chris Pratt, right, and his wife, actress Anna Faris seen at the premiere of the feature film "The Lego Movie" on Feb. 1, 2014 in Los Angeles.

The release of the 2014 Oscar nominations – and more importantly, the snubs – reveals that the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences is clearly: racist, sexist, LEGOist or Clint Eastwoodist.

While actors and directors took the high road (so far), many fans on Twitter took the low road in their reactions to those films that didn't make the Oscar cut. No Best Director nomination for "Selma" or "American Sniper" or "Unbroken"? What about Best Actress for Jennifer Aniston in "Cake?"

And perhaps the biggest miscue of all: No Oscar love for the "The LEGO Movie"?  

A favorite headline and fan quip following the Best Animated Film nominations appears to be “Everything’s not awesome…” a play on the LEGO Movie theme song “Everything is Awesome.”

In its place were "Big Hero 6," "How to Train Your Dragon 2," "Song of the Sea, "The Tale of the Princess Kaguya," and "The Boxtrolls."

However, "LEGO Movie" director Phil Lord stuck to the high road with a clever tweet, in which he did what any LEGO Master Builder would do: created his own award.

Also, the film did gross over $250 million, so there may be some solace in that.

"Would it have been wonderful to be nominated?” Robert Redford said of his being passed over for his role in "All Is Lost" in a Buzzfeed interview. “Of course. But I’m not upset by it, disturbed by it, because it is a business, and we couldn't conform to that.”

This year Oscar is also taking it on the chin for failing to nominate "American Sniper" director Clint Eastwood. That didn't stop the "American Sniper" Twitter team from keeping it positive. Mr. Eastwood himself is not a tweeter, as is evidenced by his account, which has 51k fans and zero tweets.

While Alejandro G. Iñárritu's "Birdman" and Wes Anderson's "The Grand Budapest Hotel" tied with nine nominations each, "Selma" was nominated only for Best Picture and Best Song.

Despite heaped praise, David Oyelowo did not get nominated for his role as Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and director Ava DuVernay was also passed over for Best Director.

While a darling of critics, "Selma" was criticized over its depiction of former President Lyndon Johnson, said to have been inaccurate.

Directing nods went instead to:

Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu, "Birdman"
Richard Linklater, "Boyhood"
Bennett Miller, "Foxcatcher"
Wes Anderson, "The Grand Budapest Hotel"
Morten Tyldum, "The Imitation Game"

This year Oscar is also accused of sexism for snubbing actress Jennifer Aniston for her role in "Cake," director Angelina Jolie for "Unbroken," and Ms. DuVernay for "Selma."

None of the Sturm und Drang is new in Hollywood, where Oscar has been much maligned annually by fans. In 1971, the controversial decision was to snub "Clockwork Orange" in favor of "The French Connection." In 1994, the Academy picked "Forest Gump" rather than seek "Shawshank Redemption."

Oscar was once thought to be an anti-Fiennesist, too. In 1993, "Schindler's List" took home Oscars, but Ralph Fiennes' portrayal of psychotic Nazi Amon Goeth was snubbed in favor of Tommy Lee Jones, who won for "The Fugitive."

But then, in 1996, Ralph Fiennes got an Oscar for his leading role in "The English Patient."

Today, the British actor is smiling for the nominations given to Grand Budapest Hotel – if not for himself as the lead in the film. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.