2014 in film: Why 'The Lego Movie' is the year's most successful original movie

'Lego' scored at the box office, becoming the fourth-highest grossing film of 2014, but it wasn't only a financial success – it also received praise from critics for how it poked fun at superhero conventions and prophecy-driven tales. 

Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures/AP
'The Lego Movie' features characters voiced by Chris Pratt, Elizabeth Banks, and Will Arnett.

In 2014, one of the best stories at the movies was one involving a bunch of your child’s favorite toys. 

This February’s “The Lego Movie,” an animated film about Emmet Brickowski (“Guardians of the Galaxy” star Chris Pratt) and his adventures with a group of superheroes and franchise characters, was the fourth-highest grossing movie of 2014, according to the website Box Office Mojo. It's also one of the only films in the top 10 with an original story. (We’re using the term "original story" loosely: Emmet’s adventures include encounters with comic book characters like Batman and Superman, but the central story of Emmet and Wyldstyle’s battles with the evil Lord Business is a new narrative for the movie.) Four of the highest-grossing films this year – “Guardians of the Galaxy,” “Captain America: The Winter Soldier,” “X-Men: Days of Future Past,” and “The Amazing Spider-Man 2” – were based on comic books, while the third-highest grossing film, “The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1,” is based on the book by Suzanne Collins. “Maleficent,” the sixth-highest grossing film, is based on the “Sleeping Beauty” fairy tale and “Godzilla” and “Dawn of the Planet of the Apes,” the tenth- and eighth-highest grossing films, are both based on previous movies.

Meanwhile, “Transformers: Age of Extinction,” the fifth-highest grossing film, is also an original story, but it wasn't well-received by critics. (Entertainment Weekly critic Chris Nashawaty voted the movie one of the worst of the year and called the film's story "as narratively coherent as your average funny-pages word jumble.")

In contrast, “Lego” was praised for its story and humor. The movie’s jokes include tweaks on films’ prophecies about heroes (a wise character voiced by Morgan Freeman ends a prophecy with “All this is true because it rhymes”) and villains having paper-thin disguises (represented in “Lego” by the fact that the characters in the film apparently can’t connect that Lord Business and President Business are the same person). 

Associated Press reviewer Jessica Herndon called the movie “uproarious yet touching.”

“[Directors and writers Phil] Lord and [Christopher] Miller nail the fuzzy ‘believe-in-yourself’ message and score with a spoof-heavy, yet engaging plot,” she wrote. “They've created a delightful tale championing self-reliance and distinctiveness. And though it detours from a strict brick world in the final act, the cheery humor always clicks.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.