'Peter Pan Live!': How it upended hate-watchers' expectations

'The Sound of Music Live!,' NBC's previous live musical production, received poor reviews but huge ratings. 'Pan' surprised many by being a fairly good show, with even critics who disliked it admitting that it was better than 'Music.'

Virginia Sherwood/NBC/AP
'Peter Pan' stars (from l.) John Allyn, Allison Williams, Jake Lucas, and Taylor Louderman.

Last year, more than 18 million viewers tuned into NBC’s production “The Sound of Music Live!,” making it a ratings hit for the network. But it was a guilty pleasure for many viewers: many critics disliked the production, with Associated Press critic Mark Kennedy writing that “the only real problem was the real reason most people tuned in: Carrie Underwood… [there was] zero chemistry with her love interest and lacked any intensity or shading.” Hank Stuever of the Washington Post called Underwood “as flat as the label on a Swiss Miss package of cocoa.”

This year, however, was a different story. Star Allison Williams insisted before the broadcast of NBC’s newest musical, “Peter Pan Live!,” that “Pan” can’t be “hate-watched” the way “Music” was. “’Peter Pan,’ you cannot watch cynically,” Williams, who portrayed the Boy Who Wouldn’t Grow Up, told Us Weekly before the broadcast.

And some critics agree with her post-broadcast, writing that the quality of the “Pan” production was far above last year’s “Music.” “ NBC… acquitted itself worthily, earnestly, sometimes ploddingly and, at a few golden moments, magically,” Deadline writer Jeremy Gerard wrote of the show. “If you were prepared to hoot and howl over the casting of Allison Williams… well, your snark went unrequited. This was a much better production than last year’s Sound Of Music Live!” Gerard praised the rest of the cast as well as Williams.

Entertainment Weekly writer Melissa Maerz agreed, writing, “Something incredible happened. Peter Pan Live! wasn’t an epic failure. It was something much more shocking to the American public. It was… fine. Totally fine. Just as I’d suspected. Nothing spectacular. But nothing so embarrassing as NBC’s live production of The Sound of Music… Maybe the most surprising thing about Peter Pan Live! was that it largely wiped the spite off Twitter for a few hours.” USA Today critic Mark Bianco was also mostly won over, writing, “Thursday's live musical on NBC didn't always soar, but it did generally manage to stay off the ground."

Not all reviewers agreed about the overall quality of the show – Kennedy wrote that “Pan” “needed a lot more fairy dust… [it] was an oddly ponderous, disconnected, disjointed and jerky mess.” However, he noted, “To be sure, the new show lifted the bar technically, making "The Sound of Music Live!" seem like summer stock in comparison.”

If NBC's live productions keep improving, be prepared to be wowed by their next scheduled musical, "The Music Man."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Peter Pan Live!': How it upended hate-watchers' expectations
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today