'The Walking Dead': Increasing violence sparks discussion

Reviewers called parts of the newest episode some of the most gruesome violence depicted on the show, and 'Walking Dead' composer Bear McCreary told parents not to allow their children to tune in. Meanwhile, the show continues to be a ratings juggernaut.

Andy Kropa/Invision/AP
'The Walking Dead' stars Steven Yeun (l.), Andrew Lincoln (center), and Norman Reedus (r.).

As the AMC drama “The Walking Dead” prospers in the ratings, critics have praised the show's writing, though some reviewers have blanched at the amount of violence depicted in the show. 

“Walking,” which is currently airing its fifth season, set a new record for itself when it debuted on Oct. 12, drawing 17.3 million viewers total, according to Deadline. According to AMC, the installment was the show's highest-rated episode ever. For its second episode on Oct. 20, viewership dropped slightly, with 15.1 tuning in to watch. By comparison, “Sunday Night Football” on NBC brought in 17.4 million viewers, according to Deadline at the time of reporting.

The AMC show, which follows people trying to survive in a world populated by zombies, has drawn praise from some critics for its plot so far this season. David Sims of The Atlantic called previous seasons of the show “unwieldy” but wrote that “the show’s fifth season seems much more propulsive, setting up new plots and then moving through them with surprising haste,” though he noted that “I have started many a season of this show with eager anticipation for its new direction,” and that he was afraid of “regression.”

Kate Kulzick of The A.V. Club was also pleased with the show's quick plotting, writing, “This quick-burn approach to plot is a welcome change for the series and one that will hopefully continue, at least for a while,” and Neely Tucker of The Washington Post noted that the show “ain’t playin’ no more.” 

However, some other reviewers noted the continuing and escalating amount of violence on the show. In an article titled “Are we all numb to the atrocities of ‘Walking Dead’?,” Entertainment Weekly writer Jeff Labrecque wrote, “By definition, it’s a gruesome show that doesn’t flinch from grotesque violence, and always has been… But is it too far? And is The Walking Dead getting a free pass because its explicit depictions of violence are framed within a zombiefied landscape?... The Walking Dead boasts some of the most compelling, most complex characters on television, but for a show that relies more and more on shock value, the scariest thing to me is the knowledge that we’re nowhere near the end – or the bottom." 

Meanwhile, Melissa Leon of The Daily Beast called a section of the premiere the show’s “most gruesome scene yet… Sunday’s episode of The Walking Dead concluded with a scene now permanently etched into millions of traumatized brains.”

And Bear McCreary, the show’s composer, wanted to make sure younger viewers weren’t tuning into the show, tweeting,

An unnamed spokesperson for McCreary told the Hollywood Reporter, “Over the years Bear has signed a lot of Walking Dead autographs for kids that are 10 and under who regularly watch the show. And as a new father he is very worried – particularly because season five is scarier and much more hard-core than in years past. He wants parents to be aware that it's getting rough and to not let young kids watch it.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.