'Sin City: A Dame to Kill For': Most critics aren't won over by the film

The film, which follows the first 'Sin City' installment almost a decade later, has received mostly poor reviews. 'Sin City: A Dame to Kill For' stars Josh Brolin, Eva Green, and Joseph Gordon-Levitt.

The Weinstein Company/AP
'Sin City: A Dame to Kill For' stars Joseph Gordon-Levitt.

A sequel to the 2005 film “Sin City,” based on Frank Miller's comics of the same name, about the crime-ridden fictional town of Basin City, hits theaters today. What are critics saying? 

So far, the film “Sin City: A Dame to Kill For,” which is co-directed by Miller and Robert Rodriguez and stars Josh Brolin, Jessica Alba, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, and Mickey Rourke, among others, has been mostly negatively received by critics, currently holding a score of 44 out of 100 on the review aggregator website Metacritic. By contrast, the first “City” film has a score of 74. The Monitor reviewed the first movie positively as well, awarding it three stars and writing that viewers “feel pulp pages turning under your fingers and taste grit as cars fly through the air” and noting that it boasted an “A-list cast.” Rodriguez and Miller co-directed the first “City” movie as well.

Like the first “City” film, the sequel is a collection of various stories set in Basin City, including that of gambler Johnny (Gordon-Levitt) and private investigator Dwight McCarthy (Brolin).

Chicago Sun-Times writer Richard Roeper did receive the movie positively, calling it “dark [and] exhilarating.”

“Most of the film is in spectacular, stunning shades of black and white, but every once in a while there’s a gorgeous flash of color,” he wrote. “’Sin City’… still ranks among the finest graphic novel adaptations ever… What a lineup of actors, all pouring themselves into the ‘Sin City’ universe and bringing a level of authenticity to their work, even against the super-stylized sets and special effects that make us feel as if we’re immersed in the pages of Miller’s iconic series.”

But Los Angeles Times reviewer Betsy Sharkey found the movie “visually stunning but emotionally vapid.”

“Its splendiferous comic book cast [is] mostly squandered," she wrote. "‘A Dame to Kill For’ has not one but countless tough acts to follow. Still that doesn't mean we weren't hoping Miller and co-director Robert Rodriguez would find a way to up the creative ante. In some ways they have, in many more they haven't… The melodrama is florid beyond belief – and without relief.” 

And New York Times critic Jeannette Catsoulis found that “this marriage of comic-book panels and hard-boiled dialogue has a heaviness that can’t be explained solely by its cynicism or lack of wit.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.