Jodie Foster receives an Emmy nomination for directing an 'Orange Is the New Black' episode

Jodie Foster recently received an Emmy nod for directing an episode of the first season of the Netflix series. Jodie Foster has also directed films such as the 2011 movie 'The Beaver.'

Chris Pizzello/Invision/AP
Jodie Foster recently received an Emmy nomination for directing an episode of the Netflix series 'Orange Is the New Black.'

It was recently announced that Academy Award-winning actress and director Jodie Foster is in contention for one of television's Emmy Awards.

Foster received a nomination in the category of outstanding directing for a comedy series – she helmed an episode of the first season of the Netflix series “Orange Is the New Black,” which follows a woman named Piper (Taylor Schilling, an Emmy nominee in the Outstanding Lead Actress in a Comedy Series) who feels herself to be a fish out of water as she goes to serve a prison sentence. Foster also directed an episode of the show’s second season and an installment of the political drama “House of Cards,” which is also released by Netflix.

Foster received the Best Actress prize for her work in the 1988 film “The Accused” and the 1991 movie “The Silence of the Lambs” and has directed films such as the 2011 film “The Beaver” and 1995’s “Home for the Holidays.”

She recently spoke with Deadline about the difference between what she directs and the movies in which she stars.

“As a director, dramedy is what I do,” she said. “It’s not who I am as an actor. The genre requires a very specific skill in terms of recognizing what is quirky and perverse and to be moved by it. The female prisoners on ‘Orange Is The New Black’ have a very spiritual journey that’s so complex. They’re all soul-searching and they change through each other.”

Foster said she enjoyed how speedy the TV process is.

“I’m not one for lounging around and having long soliloquies about a character,” she said. “TV is the biggest team effort and the pace happens so fast.” 

“Orange” received other nominations besides Foster’s and Schilling’s, including one for Outstanding Comedy Series, Outstanding Writing for a Comedy Series for writers Jenji Kohan and Liz Friedman, and nods for actresses Kate Mulgrew, who received a nomination for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Comedy Series, and Uzo Aduba, Laverne Cox, and Natasha Lyonne, who all received nominations for Outstanding Guest Actress in a Comedy Series.

Time writer Lily Rothman recently explained why actresses who seem to have the same amount of screen time received nods in different categories – it depends on the contract an actress signs. If someone signed a guest star contract, they must enter the guest category for consideration, even if they appear in every episode of the TV program. (In addition, both Aduba and Lyonne, for example, were recently bumped up to series regulars for the second season, but they didn't hold that status during the show's first season, which is the season that was considered for the Emmy Awards.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.