Why is 'Hamilton' one of the few acclaimed works of art to depict the American Revolution?

Pulitzer Prize and Tony-winning musical 'Hamilton' stands as the most celebrated work of art ever inspired by the American Revolution. Unlike other American conflicts, the Revolution is not often depicted on film, TV, stage, or in literature.

Lucas Jackson/Reuters
'Hamilton' stars Lin-Manuel Miranda (l.) and Christopher Jackson (r.).

Winner of the Pulitzer Prize and 11 Tony Awards, "Hamilton" is a cultural phenomenon that stands as the most celebrated work of art ever inspired by the American Revolution.

The competition is remarkably thin.

While the Civil War, World War II, and the Vietnam War have inspired acclaimed movies, plays, poems and novels, from Stephen Crane's "The Red Badge of Courage" to Steven Spielberg's "Saving Private Ryan," notable works about the American Revolution are rare outside of history books.

At 240 years since the country's birth, the tiny pantheon includes the musical "1776," the paintings of Gilbert Stuart and Emanuel Leutze, the poems "Paul Revere's Ride" by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow and "Concord Hymn" by Ralph Waldo Emerson, and the HBO adaptation of David McCullough's "John Adams" that starred Paul Giamatti and Laura Linney.

"The founding era exists on the other side of a cultural and even sartorial divide," says historian Ron Chernow, whose biography of Alexander Hamilton is the basis for Lin-Manuel Miranda's hip-hop musical. "We know the founders only through paintings and engravings, which seems to distance them from us."

"The neglect has been quite shameful," Chernow added, "at least until Lin-Manuel Miranda came along."

The deficit of Revolutionary War art began even as the battle for independence was being fought. The U.S. had no literary scene of note at the time of its founding and no distinctively American literary culture until well into the 19th century. While other wars produced memorable firsthand accounts, whether Norman Mailer's World War II novel, "The Naked and the Dead," or Iraq War veteran Phil Klay's prize-winning story collection "Redeployment," the vast majority of works about the American Revolution are based on archival material.

Filmmakers have almost entirely bypassed the Revolution. There have been no major productions about the Declaration of Independence, the drafting of the Constitution, George Washington's crossing of the Delaware River, or the dire winter in Valley Forge. No actor has given a performance as Washington, Thomas Jefferson, or Benjamin Franklin as indelible as Daniel Day-Lewis' starring role in Spielberg's "Lincoln."

"The Founding Fathers are sacred, near-mythical creatures; one portrays them at one's peril. Moses might be easier," says historian Stacy Schiff, whose book on Franklin, "A Great Improvisation: Franklin, France, and the Birth of America," came out in 2005.

The ever-popular Franklin and the traitorous Benedict Arnold have been the subjects of TV miniseries, but not big-screen biographies. Walter Isaacson's "Benjamin Franklin," published in 2003, is the basis for an upcoming documentary by Ken Burns.

"I prefer Burns to a feature film," Isaacson told The Associated Press, saying he thought a documentary would be more effective. "... That said, if someone wants to make a feature film on the delightful Ben Franklin, I am happy to help, and I'm sure he would merrily wink at us through his newfangled bifocals."

The few movies set in the Revolutionary era include the 1995 Merchant Ivory production "Jefferson in Paris," a drama starring Nick Nolte that had mixed reviews and flopped at the box office, and "The Patriot," directed by Roland Emmerich and featuring Mel Gibson as an American who leads a militia after his home and family are brutalized by the British. The film received Oscar nominations in 2001 for music, sound, and cinematography, but it was widely criticized for inaccuracies, with historian David Hackett Fisher writing that "The Patriot" is to history "as Godzilla was to biology."

Hollywood has so resisted stories of early American history that Emmerich acknowledges that if his current movie, the sci-fi spectacular "Independence Day: Resurgence," was actually set in 1776, it's unlikely the film would have been made. Emmerich says that even while making "The Patriot," he was aware that other parts of American history were more popular.

"I was surprised that even the crew members seemed to have no idea what that time period was about. They thought we were going to make a Civil War movie," he says.

Historical novels are far more common, if not more acclaimed. Gore Vidal's scandalous "Burr," about Aaron Burr, who killed Hamilton in a duel, and Howard Fast's lively "Citizen Tom Paine" were best-sellers in their time, but they don't match the stature of Walt Whitman's Civil War poems or Ernest Hemingway's World War I novel "A Farewell to Arms." Vidal biographer Jay Parini, who believes "Burr" will continue to engage readers, finds it "sad that the best novels of the American Revolution were written so long ago." He praised a 1940 novel by Kenneth Roberts, "Oliver Wiswell," and Fast's "Citizen Tom Paine," which came out in 1943.

"These two books have a lingering popularity among avid readers, but they have mostly fallen out of sight," Parini said.

Several novelists have taken on the story of Thomas Jefferson and the slave with whom he conceived children, Sally Hemings. Parini enjoyed a recent novel, "Thomas Jefferson Dreams of Sally Hemings," by Stephen O'Connor. In 1979, Barbara Chase-Riboud's best-selling "Sally Hemings" infuriated historians and Jefferson partisans with the then-unproven contention that he had physical relations with the slave. Sally Cabot Gunning's "Monticello: A Daughter and Her Father," coming out in September, centers on Jefferson and daughter Martha Jefferson Randolph, who despises slavery but knows the family home depends on it.

"I just wanted to jump down into her world and get inside her head," says Gunning.

Hamilton will be the subject of a novel due in August, Elizabeth Cobbs' "The Hamilton Affair," the story of his marriage to Elizabeth Schuyler. Cobbs, whose previous books include the Civil War novel "Broken Promises" and a series of textbooks on American history, says she began the Hamilton novel a few years ago and was anxious to create an engaging story about the Revolutionary era, "not ever having read one I liked."

"They all seemed so stilted, or perhaps just dated. Take a peek at Irving Stone's clunker on Abigail and John Adams, 'Those Who Love.' I challenge you to stay awake past page 20," she told the AP, adding that she found Hamilton a far more positive figure than she had first believed.

"And then I met Eliza, who touched my heart. I felt they had both gotten a bum rap, long before I knew ... (Hamilton) might be turned into a rapper."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why is 'Hamilton' one of the few acclaimed works of art to depict the American Revolution?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today