'Batgirl' movie to be made: Will we see more superheroine movies? 

Studios have traditionally been reluctant to invest in female-led action-hero movies. But some signs point to a future with more superheroines on the silver screen.

Chris Pizzello/AP/File
Joss Whedon, nominated for Best Direction for his film "Marvel's The Avengers," poses at the 39th Saturn Awards at The Castaway in June 2013 in Burbank, Calif. He is "nearing a deal" to write and direct a Batgirl move for Warner Bros' DC films.

Even as “Wonder Woman” prepares for release in June, it's expected that another superheroine – Batgirl – will soon get her own solo movie as well.

Filmmaker Joss Whedon is in negotiations to write, direct, and produce an untitled Batgirl movie for Warner Bros's DC Extended Universe, Variety reported on Thursday. The move, which will bring one of the most popular superheroines in the world to the screen, highlights the willingness of studios to make more movies with female leads in recent years, despite skepticism over their box office potential.  

Introduced in DC comics in 1967 as Barbra Gordon, the daughter of Gotham City police commissioner James Gordon, Batgirl first appeared in “The Million Dollar Debut of Batgirl.” She patrols the streets of Gotham at night fighting crime as Batman’s sidekick. Though she has no superpowers, like Batman, she knows martial arts and seems to have genius-level intelligence. 

Yet in spite of her popularity, she has never had her own movie. The upcoming Batgirl project will be the second movie with a female protagonist from DC films. 

The announcement comes at a moment when the lack of female superheroes has been the source of controversy. Marvel, which has brought many beloved superheroes, including Iron Man and Capitan America, back to the theater, has been reluctant to invest in female-led superhero movies. Leaked emails in May 2015 showed the studio’s Chief Executive Officer Ike Perlmutter questioning the profitability of superheroine movies, angering fans and critics alike, The Christian Science Monitor reported. 

Mr. Whedon, who has written and directed the “Avengers” series for Marvel, in addition to a number of television series, said Marvel has the responsibility to lead the shift to have more women in leading roles.

"Marvel is in a position of making a statement simply by making [a female-led] movie, which I think would be a good thing to do," Whedon said in 2015, according to IndieWire. "But it has to be a good movie, [and] it has to be a good character."

Progress has been slow for female protagonists. But a pair of commercial successes in 2015 – “Star Wars: The Force Awakens” and “Mad Max: Fury Road” – both offered strong performances by female main characters and may have helped to reassure movie executives that audiences are not averse to female-led stories

This year, while Marvel has hinted that a Black Widow movie is on top of its slate, Marvel’s rival DC films has also been stepping up to meet the demand. Margot Robbie, who portrayed Harley Quinn in DC films’ “Suicide Squad,” has reportedly been keen on making an all-female superhero movie. The idea has been welcomed by film critic Ben Child, who said “female-focused stories of the hugely popular DC SuperHero Girls line rather than endlessly regurgitated Batman and Superman tales” could be the real strength of DC. 

“The future is looking both bright and diverse, and DC suddenly looks ready to lead the way by stepping into uncharted territory where its rivals fear to tread,” he wrote in a piece for the Guardian in May.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.