Why Old Navy charges more for women's plus-sized clothing – and why that might change

A petition to Gap Inc. asks the Old Navy brand to eliminate "sexism" and "sizeism" from its pricing.

PRNewsFoto/Old Navy/File

Should "plus-size" women pay more for their clothing? A petition to Old Navy answers, 'No.'

A change.org petition asks the clothing retail chain to stop charging more for plus-sized women's clothing than for regular-sized women's – and "big" sized men's clothing.

Renee Posey wrote the letter after noticing jeans on Old Navy's website cost $12-15 more in women's plus sizes, but not in men's "big" sizes.

Old Navy’s Rockstar Super Skinny Jeans cost $27 in a size 6. The same jeans in a size 26 cost $40. Alternatively, the men’s Slim-Fit Jean costs $25 – no matter the size.

"This overtly discriminatory pricing policy indicates sexism and sizeism on the part of Old Navy that is unfair to women of size and unacceptable to me as a consumer of Old Navy's products," the petition – which has reached 88,000 signatures – reads.

If the company is charging plus-sized women more to cover the cost of the fabric being used, Posey wondered, then why doesn't Old Navy charge large men more for their clothing that "regular-sized" men?  She detects a sexist pricing policy.

"I was fine paying the extra money as a plus-sized woman, because, you know, more fabric equals higher cost of manufacture. However, selling jeans to larger-sized men at the same cost as they sell to smaller men not only negates the cost of manufacture argument, but indicates that Old Navy is participating in both sexism and sizeism, directed only at women," she wrote.

She further noted that while the Old Navy website separates out "Women's Plus" clothes into one section of the website, all the men's clothing sizes are kept together.

After a "canned" response from Gap Inc. – Old Navy's parent company – at 20,000 signatures, the petition gained national media attention, and started a conversation with a company representative.

In a posting on the petition website, Posey informed signees the Gap representative, Edie Kissko, told her the petition has prompted internal discussions in the company, including meetings with the design team and brand president.

"This has really made them think about how they have been approaching their female plus-sized customer, and although the words 'industry standard' were mentioned quite a bit, they are seeing the potential for this to turn them into a pioneer in their industry by truly focusing on what the plus-sized woman is looking for in clothing," Posey reported.

She said Ms. Kissko said it costs more to create women's plus sizes, and that there is a difference between "extended sizing" (making the same pattern bigger) and "plus sizing" (which requires a different pattern).

Posey said the company was also talking about getting plus sizes back in stores (instead of online-only), and creating a “plus-sized consumer panel” to provide direct feedback on the  plus-sized line, how they are presented on the website, the models that they use, the fit, the style, and the price.

Posey encouraged followers to keep the conversation going by using #OldNavyPlus to spread their ideas.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why Old Navy charges more for women's plus-sized clothing – and why that might change
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today