Reddit rises as Web's best conversation

Social news site Reddit offers a warren of links, forums, and perspectives – including an interview with President Obama.

Obama For America/Reddit
President Obama's campaign posted this verification photo for his Reddit AMA interview.

Near the end of August, President Obama's campaign trail swung through a curious community. He stood before the digital crowds of Reddit.com and called out, "Hi, I'm Barack Obama, president of the United States. Ask me anything."

If this call for questions had rung out over Facebook or Twitter, it wouldn't have made much of a stir. Major social media sites have played a key role in both the 2008 and current presidential elections. But Reddit?

The social news site is a far cry from the omnipresent, family-friendly pages of Facebook and the pithy, personality-driven ethos of Twitter. But Reddit has a huge following among a particular breed of Web-savvy readers. Its warren of links, discussion forums, and Ask Me Anything interviews (or AMAs) racks up 3 billion page views a month.

Mr. Obama's interview could be a turning point for the seven-year-old site. Oprah Winfrey introduced Twitter to a mainstream audience in 2009 when she posted her first "tweet" on daytime TV. Now, the president's virtual visit may have hoisted Reddit's growing influence and further legitimized its highly successful AMA format.

"In the early days, we needed to book – convince – celebrities to participate," says Erik Martin, general manager of Reddit. "Then, maybe three years ago, it just started to happen without any involvement from us whatsoever."

This critical mass has pulled in musicians, writers, politicians, Hollywood stars, and online celebrities. But Mr. Martin says many of the best AMAs come from obscure people with interesting perspectives. Perennial listmaker Buzzfeed.com listed among its all-time favorites "I saved a girl from drowning. She then sued me. AMA." and "[I am a] jury member who caused a hung jury. Two months later, evidence showed the guy was indeed not guilty. AMA."

Like many pages on Reddit, an AMA might look like a total mess to an outsider. The cascading, text-heavy site has a careful order, but it takes a moment to see the method behind the madness. So here's a beginner's guide to reading along and joining in on Reddit's Ask Me Anything interviews.

The format is simple enough. People post a message on Reddit's forums saying "I am a [blank]. Ask me anything." It's customary to provide some proof that people are who they say they are. Readers can then respond in one of two ways. Some will join in on the conversation, asking – or replying to – questions. Users also vote on which questions they find interesting. Popular comments rise to the top, making it easier for the interviewee and readers to follow along.

This democratic free-for-all allows the community to guide the conversation. Commenters may be as serious or as goofy as they like. The group decides what the group wants to know.

For example, Reddit asked Obama about space exploration (he's for it), his most difficult decision as president (sending additional troops into Afghanistan), and his favorite basketball star (Michael Jordan, "I'm a Bulls guy").

The president did not answer several of the most popular questions, such as his views on the "revolving door" of retired congressmen becoming lobbyists and whether he'd rather be attacked by one horse-sized duck or 100 duck-sized horses.

Obama answered 10 questions in his 30-minute interview, which disappointed Reddit fan Andy Mackenzie. AMA participants usually agree to two hours. Some of the most popular people return a day later to answer follow-ups.

Mr. Mackenzie, a graduate student in New York, says that first-time AMA readers may be thrown by Reddit's system of indentation. If you reply to a comment, the site tucks your message underneath the original. "On the far left, you've got the original question," he says. "Indented below that are direct responses and there can be many, many levels of indents" as side conversations play out.

Visit reddit.com/r/iama for a current list of AMAs. There's also a partial schedule of upcoming interviews.

For more on how technology intersects daily life, follow Chris on Twitter @venturenaut.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.